TG Inspector TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @Penetration_25

@Penetration_25: statistics and cleanliness index

𝙿𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 😈

Share this report
Telegram

Grade D some metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-18
Subscribers
42,892
Median views
3,863
ERR
9%
Posts sampled
40
Niche NSFW 18+
Post language Russian
Channel age 2 years

Data from 2026-10-18 — 19 days old.

Assessment summary

Explicit 18+ channel: short videos and photos, captions — a couple of words and network names, the feed runs in a continuous stream — about 17 posts per day. Telegram restricted the channel for spreading pornographic content — this is the only finding of the check.

The share of subscribers who see a post is lower than in most similar channels in the catalog, and the feed doesn’t stop: an ad quickly goes down. In the last message window, about 35% of numbers are missing — some publications in the feed have been deleted.

About the channel

Channel with explicit adult content: short videos and photos, captions — a couple of words or network names. It has been run for two and a half years, they write in Russian; in the sample, about two thirds of posts are videos, the rest are photos, and about a fifth of the feed is reposts from other channels on the same topic.

In the catalog, next to it are @juicybust, @omghub_official, and @a_necdot69. @juicybust is slightly larger by subscribers, and a larger share of subscribers sees a post there than here. @omghub_official is larger both in size and in the share of subscribers who see a post. @a_necdot69 is larger, but the share of subscribers who see a post there is smaller.

What it publishes:

  • Short 18+ videos: clips with captions like network names and a link to its own channels.
  • Photo collections: explicit photos of girls, sometimes with tattoos and piercings.
  • Promo of other channels: occasionally — collections of 18+ channels and links to bots.

Posts come out mainly on weekends — they account for about 90% of publications, more often during the day and in the evening. The channel reposts entries from «𝐌𝐨𝐦𝐬 𝐢'𝐝 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐟*𝐜𝐤🍑», «𝚈𝚞𝚖𝚖𝚢 𝚑𝚘𝚕𝚎𝚜 💋» and other channels on the same topic. Next is a stream of short posts with frequent reposts and rare ads.

By subscribers, it ranks #4 of 18 channels in the NSFW 18+ niche of the catalog.

What to pay attention to

Telegram restricted the channel (restricted)

The platform imposed restrictions on the channel for violating the rules. Reason: This channel can’t be displayed because it was used to spread pornographic content..

What grade D means

The index is clearly lowered: one or more metrics fall outside usual values. The “How the assessment was produced” section shows which ones.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 9 NSFW 18+ catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 181 to 60,281 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 8 of 9
@Penetration_25 9%
similar channels median 28%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 8 of 9
@Penetration_25 1.6
similar channels median 0.48

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Scroll horizontally to see the full charts.

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Oct 16 to Oct 18. The dashed line is the median (3,863).

03.2K6.4KOct 16: 5,336 viewsOct 16: 5,419 viewsOct 16: 6,396 viewsOct 16: 6,344 viewsOct 17: 5,326 viewsOct 17: 4,866 viewsOct 17: 5,470 viewsOct 17: 4,688 viewsOct 17: 5,097 viewsOct 17: 4,200 viewsOct 17: 5,720 viewsOct 17: 4,293 viewsOct 17: 4,110 viewsOct 17: 4,026 viewsOct 17: 4,094 viewsOct 17: 5,600 viewsOct 17: 4,079 viewsOct 17: 4,105 viewsOct 17: 4,083 viewsOct 17: 3,832 viewsOct 17: 3,895 viewsOct 17: 3,818 viewsOct 17: 3,533 viewsOct 17: 3,344 viewsOct 18: 3,016 viewsOct 18: 2,903 viewsOct 18: 2,582 viewsOct 18: 2,601 viewsOct 18: 2,468 viewsOct 18: 2,176 viewsOct 18: 2,135 viewsOct 18: 1,920 viewsOct 18: 1,835 viewsOct 18: 1,651 viewsOct 18: 1,560 viewsOct 18: 1,338 viewsOct 18: 1,036 viewsOct 18: 874 viewsOct 18: 691 viewsOct 18: 476 views Oct 16Oct 18
  • post views
  • 21 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 3,863

Maximum: 6,396 views. Data as of Oct 18.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel's data has been collected once — the chart will appear after the next update.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

So many posts that an ad quickly slides down the feed.

About 2,941–4,132 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 0. 11 more are too fresh.

Without an ad label: 9 posts.

Questions about @Penetration_25

What does this channel’s purity index show?

The purity index is 45 out of 100, grade D, level “there are deviations”. One of the deviations in the check is the channel restriction by Telegram for spreading pornographic content.

What is the reach of the channel’s posts?

The median is about 3.9 thousand views with 42.9 thousand subscribers, meaning a post is seen by about 9% of the base. This is less than in most similar channels in the catalog.

Can ads be placed here?

The advisability of placement is marked as debatable. Reason: the feed comes out as a conveyor, about 17 posts per day, and an ad quickly goes down out of the visible part.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-18
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @Penetration_25 assessment dated 2026-10-18 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 42,892 subscribers, median post views were 3,863, ERR was 9.0%, and the cleanliness index was 45/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/obsessed_with_ai.