TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @a_necdot69

@a_necdot69: statistics and cleanliness index

Анекдоты | Мемы | Юмор 🍒

Лучший канал по взрослому юмору🍒🍒🍒 Все вопросы - @richadvokat, @HE3AKOH, @AIphariusOmegon, @Diggsale @G_OMEDIA - агенство https://t.me/otzovanek Менеджеры: https://t.me/+acqIbcLJM_02ZjZi

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-19
Subscribers
136,374
Median views
5,919
ERR
4.3%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Humor & Memes
Post language Russian
Channel age 2 years

Data from 2026-09-19 — 20 days old.

Assessment summary

There is no artificial inflation on the channel, but with an audience of 136 thousand subscribers, posts gain only about 5.9 thousand views. Due to the high posting frequency—almost 22 posts per day—an ad post gets lost in the feed very quickly.

Placing ads here is questionable: there is a risk of overpaying for a large subscriber count while getting modest real reach.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 6 Humor & Memes catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 53,141 to 195,467 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 6 of 6
@a_necdot69 4.3%
similar channels median 15.4%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 4 of 6
@a_necdot69 0.7
similar channels median 2.11

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 17 to Sep 19. The dashed line is the median (5,919).

03.4K6.8KSep 17: 6,599 viewsSep 17: 5,935 viewsSep 17: 6,740 viewsSep 17: 6,547 viewsSep 17: 6,453 viewsSep 17: 6,356 viewsSep 17: 6,468 viewsSep 17: 6,609 viewsSep 17: 3,732 viewsSep 17: 3,683 viewsSep 17: 3,679 viewsSep 17: 3,650 viewsSep 17: 6,494 viewsSep 17: 6,673 viewsSep 18: 6,794 viewsSep 18: 6,397 viewsSep 18: 6,306 viewsSep 18: 6,287 viewsSep 18: 6,216 viewsSep 18: 6,190 viewsSep 18: 6,202 viewsSep 18: 6,090 viewsSep 18: 6,007 viewsSep 18: 5,934 viewsSep 18: 5,905 viewsSep 18: 3,063 viewsSep 18: 5,838 viewsSep 18: 5,733 viewsSep 18: 5,728 viewsSep 18: 5,618 viewsSep 18: 5,519 viewsSep 18: 5,296 viewsSep 19: 3,667 viewsSep 19: 3,592 viewsSep 19: 3,238 viewsSep 19: 2,915 viewsSep 19: 2,374 viewsSep 19: 2,200 viewsSep 19: 1,334 viewsSep 19: 471 views Sep 17Sep 19
  • post views
  • 19 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 5,919

Maximum: 6,794 views. Data as of Sep 19.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 19: index 90, grade AJun 19Aug 15: index 91, grade A+Aug 15Sep 19: index 91, grade A+Sep 19

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

About 3,676–6,366 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 0. 20 more are too fresh.

Without an ad label: 16 posts.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @a_necdot69

Are subscribers or views inflated?

No signs of artificial inflation were found; the risk is minimal. Audience and view dynamics look natural, and comments are open.

How many views will an ad get?

Posts gain an average of about 5.9 thousand views—slightly over 4% of the total subscriber count. Meanwhile, due to the dense flow of content, the ad quickly drops down the feed.

Is it worth buying ads on this channel?

Placement is considered questionable due to low reach relative to the channel's total base. Buying ads only makes sense at a price calculated from actual views, not subscriber count.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-19
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @a_necdot69 assessment dated 2026-09-19 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 136,374 subscribers, median post views were 5,919, ERR was 4.3%, and the cleanliness index was 91/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.