TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @otesclo

@otesclo: statistics and cleanliness index

DOLLS

поддержка — @otessupport сайт ( временно недоступен)— https://отес.рф/ мы в соц-сетях — @DOLLS.RF Спасибо, что вы с нами 🤍🪽

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-09
Subscribers
2,046
Median views
3,381
ERR
165.2%
Posts sampled
25
Niche Fashion

Data from 2026-09-09 — 29 days old.

Assessment summary

A low risk score confirms the organic nature of the traffic: views exceeding the subscriber count (ERR 165%) are explained by viral interest in the brand's visuals and external forwards from other social networks.

However, advertising here is questionable due to the extremely low posting frequency (0.1 posts per day) and the specifics of a mono-brand store, where third-party advertising may look out of place and fail to achieve the expected reach amid audience churn.

What to pay attention to

More views than subscribers: ERR ≈ 165%

Views exceed the subscriber count, and the other metrics agree: views vary noticeably from post to post and people react. This happens when non-subscribers read the posts — via links, forwards and search — or when the channel used to have more subscribers.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 7 Fashion catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 1,090 to 5,394 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 7 of 7
@otesclo 165.2%
similar channels median 27.9%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 4 of 7
@otesclo 0.52
similar channels median 0.64

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 25 posts with views, from Feb 24 to Sep 6. The dashed line is the median (3,381).

03.9K7.7KFeb 24: 6,788 viewsApr 10: 6,866 viewsApr 10: 7,714 viewsApr 10: 7,711 viewsApr 23: 3,715 viewsApr 29: 3,381 viewsApr 30: 7,122 viewsMay 1: 4,890 viewsMay 1: 4,517 viewsMay 1: 5,124 viewsMay 1: 5,601 viewsMay 3: 6,850 viewsMay 11: 4,987 viewsAug 21: 1,475 viewsAug 21: 1,455 viewsAug 21: 1,424 viewsAug 21: 1,400 viewsAug 21: 1,307 viewsAug 21: 1,330 viewsAug 21: 1,586 viewsAug 21: 1,599 viewsAug 26: 1,000 viewsAug 26: 1,151 viewsSep 4: 677 viewsSep 6: 454 views Feb 24Sep 6
  • post views
  • median 3,381

Maximum: 7,714 views. Data as of Sep 9.

What scoring found in the view pattern

More views than subscribers: ERR ≈ 165%

Views exceed the subscriber count, and the other metrics agree: views vary noticeably from post to post and people react. This happens when non-subscribers read the posts — via links, forwards and search — or when the channel used to have more subscribers.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Aug 10: index 96, grade A+Aug 10Sep 9: index 93, grade A+Sep 9

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Posts come out rarely, so an ad will struggle to get views.

About 660–1,318 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Advertising posts have a median of 6,850 views versus 1,592 for regular posts — 330% higher.

Based on 3 advertising and 22 regular posts older than two days.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @otesclo

What is the risk of artificial manipulation on the channel?

The risk score is minimal (7 out of 100), with no signs of manipulation detected: genuine reactions and a natural variance in views indicate an organic audience.

Why are there more views than subscribers?

The median views stand at 3,381 with 2,046 subscribers, driven by viral forwards of clothing photoshoots to external chats and traffic from the brand's profiles on other social networks.

Is it worth buying advertising on this channel?

Placement is considered questionable: posts are published extremely rarely (roughly once every 10 days), the audience is gradually declining (-177 subscribers over the month), and the channel itself functions as a showcase for its own clothing brand.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-09
Sample
The latest 25 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @otesclo assessment dated 2026-09-09 uses 25 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 2,046 subscribers, median post views were 3,381, ERR was 165.2%, and the cleanliness index was 93/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.