TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @onlyfans_anokhina

@onlyfans_anokhina: statistics and cleanliness index

Слив Anokhina Elizabeth OnlyFans | Лиза Анохина онлифанс leak

Канал со сливами Лизы Анохиной, слив лиза анохина, слив лизы анохиной

Share this report
Telegram

Grade D some metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-08
Subscribers
1,295
Median views
8,412
ERR
649.6%
Posts sampled
28
Niche NSFW 18+
Post language Russian
Channel age 5 months

Data from 2026-10-08 — fresh.

Assessment summary

The channel publishes explicit photos and promotes paid adult content collections.

Median views exceed the subscriber count by more than six times with zero forwards, while only 0.22% of readers leave reactions. Due to such reach metric anomalies, advertising feasibility is assessed as questionable: predicting real performance in advance is difficult.

What to pay attention to

More views than subscribers: ERR ≈ 650%

Median views are noticeably higher than the subscriber count — across half of the posts, not just for a single viral one. This can happen when posts spread beyond the channel via forwards, chats, or external traffic, but other metrics do not support this explanation.

What grade D means

The index is clearly lowered: one or more metrics fall outside usual values. The “How the assessment was produced” section shows which ones.

Channel content

📣 Heavy advertising load

The feed regularly features invite links to third-party channels and a bot selling paid access to restricted content.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 28 posts with views, from May 17 to Oct 1. The dashed line is the median (8,412).

06.2K12KMay 17: 7,248 viewsMay 17: 8,302 viewsMay 19: 7,636 viewsMay 22: 7,139 viewsMay 23: 7,536 viewsMay 23: 7,899 viewsMay 23: 8,248 viewsMay 26: 7,770 viewsMay 27: 8,241 viewsMay 30: 7,416 viewsMay 31: 7,869 viewsMay 31: 8,090 viewsMay 31: 8,522 viewsJun 1: 9,633 viewsJun 2: 9,175 viewsJun 4: 9,005 viewsJun 5: 9,507 viewsJun 6: 9,158 viewsJun 7: 10,577 viewsJun 8: 10,996 viewsJun 9: 10,691 viewsJun 11: 11,305 viewsJun 14: 11,121 viewsJun 15: 12,397 viewsJun 18: 12,387 viewsJul 5: 9,803 viewsSep 29: 1,050 viewsOct 1: 827 views May 17Oct 1
  • post views
  • median 8,412

Maximum: 12,397 views. Data as of Oct 8.

What scoring found in the view pattern

More views than subscribers: ERR ≈ 650%

Median views are noticeably higher than the subscriber count — across half of the posts, not just for a single viral one. This can happen when posts spread beyond the channel via forwards, chats, or external traffic, but other metrics do not support this explanation.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Sep 29: index 50, grade DSep 29Oct 8: index 50, grade DOct 8

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Some of the channel's metrics deviate, so it is hard to say in advance how many people will see an ad.

About 883–994 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Few recent posts, so this is a rough forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

Advertising posts have a median of 9,175 views versus 8,302 for regular posts — 11% higher.

Based on 5 advertising and 23 regular posts older than two days.

Questions about @onlyfans_anokhina

What integrity index was recorded for the channel?

The channel's integrity index is 50 out of 100 (grade D, "anomalies present" level). The score was affected by a severe discrepancy between the subscriber count and post views.

Why is advertising here marked as questionable?

The reason for this verdict is a reduced integrity index. When views exceed the audience by multiple times, it is difficult to predict how many real users will actually see an ad post.

How do views compare to the channel's subscriber count?

With a subscriber base of around 1.3 thousand, posts gather a median of over 8.4 thousand views. This results in an ERR of around 649.6%, yet there are no forwards or comments in the channel.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-08
Sample
The latest 28 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @onlyfans_anokhina assessment dated 2026-10-08 uses 28 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 1,295 subscribers, median post views were 8,412, ERR was 649.6%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.