TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @nutellovcheck

Fake engagement check for @nutellovcheck

армэн нутеллов official — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-12.

по поводу рекламы / сотрудничества - @nutellov_king (за рекламу только сюда оплату,не менеджерам) twitch - twitch.tv/nutellov приват - https://t.me/privatnutellova management - @Chelbanchik @herweikwin 🔪hood2hood🔪

Grade D some signals require caution cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-12
Subscribers
21,906
Median views
11,369
ERR
51.9%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Blogs
Post language Russian
Channel age 2 years

Assessment summary

A high reach of over 50% of the subscriber base, combined with completely disabled comments and the deletion of about 88% of publications, indicates a risk of artificial view inflation or regular cleanups of old ads. For an advertiser, this creates uncertainty: it is impossible to verify genuine audience engagement, and there is a high probability that the publication will be removed from the feed shortly.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 42 checked Blogs channels with no visible signs of manipulation. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 14 to 830,951 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 23 of 42
51.9% for @nutellovcheck similar channels median: 46.1%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 29 of 42
2.29 for @nutellovcheck similar channels median: 3.59

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-12
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @nutellovcheck assessment dated 2026-09-12 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 21,906 subscribers, median post views were 11,369, ERR was 51.9%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Channel content

📣 Heavy advertising load

The feed features integrations of online casinos, gaming servers, and third-party services, as well as regular offers to purchase ads.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Some of the views may be fake.

About 5,518–11,035 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Advertising posts have a median of 11,171 views versus 11,510 for regular posts — 3% lower.

Based on 5 advertising and 33 regular posts older than two days.

Without an ad label: 3 posts.

What grade D means

Clear signs of manipulation: several strong signals at once. Ads here are risky.

What to pay attention to

It looks like some posts were deleted (≈88% gaps in post numbering)

There are many gaps in the numbering of recent publications — some posts have been deleted. This is often done to hide finished ad posts and conceal their actual reach. On its own, this is an indirect sign (posts are also deleted when editing).

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Jun 24 to Sep 11. The dashed line is the median (11,369).

08.6K17KJun 24: 13,385 viewsJun 26: 13,270 viewsJun 27: 12,971 viewsJul 2: 15,973 viewsJul 3: 15,436 viewsJul 7: 13,023 viewsJul 10: 13,205 viewsJul 10: 11,301 viewsJul 12: 10,568 viewsJul 12: 11,763 viewsJul 18: 13,652 viewsJul 18: 12,196 viewsJul 18: 10,701 viewsJul 18: 10,359 viewsJul 19: 17,174 viewsJul 20: 15,047 viewsJul 20: 13,375 viewsJul 23: 12,412 viewsJul 25: 11,988 viewsJul 27: 12,178 viewsJul 31: 11,510 viewsAug 2: 11,766 viewsAug 4: 11,315 viewsAug 4: 11,320 viewsAug 4: 11,364 viewsAug 4: 11,244 viewsAug 6: 11,171 viewsAug 8: 12,234 viewsAug 9: 11,375 viewsAug 17: 11,027 viewsAug 18: 10,655 viewsAug 21: 11,355 viewsAug 23: 10,563 viewsAug 26: 10,114 viewsAug 30: 8,898 viewsSep 5: 7,605 viewsSep 5: 6,765 viewsSep 7: 5,875 viewsSep 11: 3,669 viewsSep 11: 3,322 views Jun 24Sep 11

Maximum: 17,174 views. Data as of Sep 12.

No deviations found in views. Manipulation doesn't always show up in views, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

@nutellovcheck forwards posts from

Check today: @nutellovcheck

Data from 2026-09-12 — 8 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @nutellovcheck and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @nutellovcheck

Questions about @nutellovcheck

What is the risk level of this channel?

The channel received a risk score of 50 out of 100 (medium level). The high proportion of deleted publications and disabled comments despite unusually high reach raise suspicions.

Is it worth buying ads on this channel?

Placement is marked as questionable due to the likelihood of partial view inflation. There is also a risk that the ad post will be quickly removed by the administrator as part of regular feed cleanups.

What kind of viewership do sponsored posts get?

Sponsored posts gain an average of about 11.2 thousand views, which is practically equal to regular posts (11.5 thousand). However, gauging real user interest is difficult due to disabled discussions.

Similar channels in Blogs

All channels in Blogs

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.

Check @nutellovcheck