- প্রতিদিন - সিউর শট ফ্রি VIP মাল্টি পেতে চ্যানেলে জয়েন করুন ❤️ ⏳ 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗹 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗲𝗱 — 𝟮𝟬𝟭𝟰 💯 𝟭𝟬𝟬% 𝗧𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗱 & 𝗔𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗹 ✅ 𝟭𝟮+ 𝗬𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀 𝗘𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝗧𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺 𝐎𝐖𝐍𝐄𝐑 - @NEHAL_VAI_140K
checked 2026-09-10
- Subscribers
- 99,878
- Median views
- 2,638
- ERR
- 2.6%
- Posts sampled
- 37
Assessment summary
Out of nearly 100 thousand subscribers, posts are viewed on average by only 2.6 thousand people (ERR 2.64%), and comments are completely closed. The high posting frequency — over 21 posts per day — means that an advertising message will drown in the stream of repetitive betting posts within just a couple of hours. Buying ads is questionable due to weak subscriber base reach and the toxic fixed-matches niche.
Compared with similar channels
Compared with 17 checked Bets & Gambling channels with no visible signs of manipulation. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 3,424 to 1,643,071 subscribers.
This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-09-10
- Sample
- The latest 37 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @Nehal_Vai_400K assessment dated 2026-09-10 uses 37 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 99,878 subscribers, median post views were 2,638, ERR was 2.6%, and the cleanliness index was 81/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Channel content
🚩 Possible scam or deception signals
The feed is filled with offers to buy "100% fixed matches" and accumulators with a guarantee of winning, as well as templated payout screenshots.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: not recommended.
Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.
About 2,278–2,972 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.
Reach of advertising posts
No advertising posts among the latest 37.
What grade A means
Looks clean: metrics are normal, no manipulation visible.
What to pay attention to
Low reach: ERR ≈ 2.6%
View engagement is below normal for a channel of this size. It could be due to the niche and a passive audience, but it is worth checking.
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 37 posts with views, from Sep 8 to Sep 10. The dashed line is the median (2,638).
- post views
- 12 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
- median 2,638
Maximum: 4,012 views. Data as of Sep 10.
What scoring found in the view pattern
Low reach: ERR ≈ 2.6%
View engagement is below normal for a channel of this size. It could be due to the niche and a passive audience, but it is worth checking.
What could not be calculated
View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.
Data from 2026-09-10 — 10 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.
Buy advertising
No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.
We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.
Monitor this channel
The bot will recheck @Nehal_Vai_400K and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.
Monitor @Nehal_Vai_400KQuestions about @Nehal_Vai_400K
What real reach will an ad post get?
On average, a post will be viewed by about 2,638 people. This is only 2.64% of the channel's total audience.
Why is placement in the channel considered questionable?
The reason is weak reach: posts are viewed by an insignificant portion of subscribers. In addition, with a frequency of over 21 posts per day, the ad will instantly get lost in the feed.
Is this channel safe for an advertiser?
The technical risk of manipulation is low (score 19 out of 100), but the channel's content is based on promises of guaranteed earnings on bets. Placement here may carry reputational risks.
Similar channels in Bets & Gambling
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 99 · A+
All channels in Bets & Gambling
Other checked channels
- 97 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 70 · B
- 98 · A+
- 70 · B
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 90 · A
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.