TG Inspector TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @mplatonov_19

@mplatonov_19: statistics and cleanliness index

mplatonov19

🥇 MVP IN THE SCHOOL LEAGUE AND IN PAVLOVSKY POSAD 🔥 VOLLEYBALL CLUB “VOSTOK” 🦾 DIAGONAL FORWARD ⚡️ NUMBER 19 💎 17 YEARS OLD 💳 https://tips.tips/000485980 💠 @mplatonov19

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-16
Subscribers
6,228
Median views
3,076
ERR
49.4%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Blogs
Post language Russian
Channel age 2 years

Data from 2026-10-16 — 22 days old.

Assessment summary

Personal blog of a volleyball player: match reports for the "Vostok" club, photos from games and trips, sunsets and everyday notes — posts in Russian, the channel has been running for two and a half years.

In terms of reaction share, it outperforms all similar channels in the catalog — 13.92% versus the median 2.24%, and ERR is almost 50% higher than most of them. Subscribers grew by only 26 over the last 41 days, but the median views rose from 1761 to 3076; publications are infrequent, about once every three days, with no ads or forwards, so an announcement won't drown in the feed and gathers more reactions than similar channels.

About the channel

Personal blog of a volleyball player: the author plays for the "Vostok" club and talks about the team and the season — from set scores to the move from "EKOlab" to a new club. The feed features photos from games and tournaments, shots from trips, sunsets and home notes; posts are in Russian, the channel has been running for two and a half years, more than half of the publications are photos, there are text reports and short videos.

In the catalog, next to it are @ibeastie, @itsdanilevskaya and @anstiso. By subscribers, it is larger than @ibeastie but smaller than @itsdanilevskaya and @anstiso, and the share of subscribers who see a post here is lower than that of each of these channels.

What it publishes:

  • Match reports: tournament results and set scores — a win over the "NEPRIDUMALI" team, second place in Elektrougli.
  • Photos from games and trips: gyms, outdoor courts, train stations, collections of city views.
  • Personal notes: sunsets, a night game of Minecraft, a brother's birthday.
  • Links under posts: to a donation service and a "VKontakte" page.

Posts come out more often in the evening and on weekdays, about once every three days; there are no forwards from other channels in the sample, and by subscriber count the channel is in the upper third of the niche. The feed is a leisurely personal diary: short notes and photos, with no third-party ads.

By subscribers, it ranks #35 of 87 channels in the Blogs niche of the catalog.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 14 Blogs catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 2,203 to 18,022 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 11 of 14
@mplatonov_19 49.4%
similar channels median 28.7%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 14 of 14
@mplatonov_19 13.92
similar channels median 2.74

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Scroll horizontally to see the full charts.

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from May 22 to Oct 14. The dashed line is the median (3,076).

03.3K6.5KMay 22: 939 viewsMay 23: 1,488 viewsMay 25: 2,602 viewsMay 26: 1,403 viewsMay 29: 1,519 viewsMay 30: 1,938 viewsMay 31: 1,396 viewsJun 3: 1,103 viewsJun 3: 1,179 viewsJun 4: 2,131 viewsJun 6: 1,864 viewsJun 12: 2,732 viewsJun 13: 1,234 viewsJun 15: 2,816 viewsJun 20: 2,810 viewsJun 23: 2,913 viewsJun 28: 2,215 viewsJul 4: 2,679 viewsJul 8: 3,854 viewsJul 20: 1,810 viewsJul 23: 4,369 viewsJul 26: 4,181 viewsJul 27: 2,746 viewsAug 3: 3,348 viewsAug 8: 3,240 viewsAug 14: 4,479 viewsAug 16: 4,627 viewsAug 16: 4,836 viewsAug 16: 4,649 viewsAug 16: 4,912 viewsAug 16: 4,198 viewsAug 16: 4,008 viewsAug 30: 4,257 viewsSep 1: 4,199 viewsSep 1: 5,047 viewsSep 5: 5,615 viewsSep 18: 6,516 viewsSep 27: 5,895 viewsOct 4: 3,905 viewsOct 14: 5,396 views May 22Oct 14
  • post views
  • median 3,076

Maximum: 6,516 views. Data as of Oct 16.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Sep 5: index 94, grade A+Sep 5Oct 16: index 92, grade A+Oct 16

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

About 4,587 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @mplatonov_19

What deviations did the check find for @mplatonov_19?

The purity index is 92 out of 100, grade A+, level "metrics within normal": the check found no signals lowering the index. In the window of the latest messages, about 3% of numbers are missing.

Are there signs of artificial inflation on the channel?

The check measured views, reactions and subscriber dynamics and found no signals lowering the index: the purity index is 92 out of 100. Reactions account for 13.92% of views, ERR is 49.4%, meaning a post is seen by about half of the base.

Is it worth placing ads here?

The check's verdict is that placement is justified. There were no ad posts in the sample, so the reach of advertising publications was not assessed; an ordinary post is seen by 49.4% of subscribers (ERR).

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-16
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @mplatonov_19 assessment dated 2026-10-16 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 6,228 subscribers, median post views were 3,076, ERR was 49.4%, and the cleanliness index was 92/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/obsessed_with_ai.