TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @mom_Styleeee

Fake engagement check for @mom_Styleeee

Mom in Style 👛 — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-23.

Комьюнити о моде и красоте 💖 💸 Реклама: @TerViki 📩 Админ: @PavelRus14

55/100
cleanliness index
Grade C
some signals require caution
Subscribers
40046
Median views
579
ERR
1.4%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Lifestyle

Evidence snapshot

The @mom_Styleeee assessment dated 2026-08-23 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 40,046 subscribers, median post views were 579, ERR was 1.4%, and the cleanliness index was 55/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

A small share of subscribers sees each post, limiting likely advertising reach.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 479–868 views.

What grade C means

Several metrics require caution. They may indicate partially manipulated views or a passive audience, so advertising should be evaluated carefully.

Run a fresh check for @mom_Styleeee

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-23. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @mom_Styleeee

Questions about @mom_Styleeee

What does grade C mean for @mom_Styleeee?

Several metrics require caution. They may indicate partially manipulated views or a passive audience, so advertising should be evaluated carefully.

What is the ERR of @mom_Styleeee?

ERR is 1.4%. Median post views equal 1.4% of the channel's 40,046 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 55/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @mom_Styleeee