TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @melIstroytg

Fake engagement check for @melIstroytg

MELLSTROY BONUS — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-22.

Азартный телеграм посвященный MELLSTROY Вход строго 18+ Реклама - @SteveDMM,

50/100
cleanliness index
Grade D
some signals require caution
Subscribers
57621
Median views
15462
ERR
26.8%
Posts sampled
22
Niche
Entertainment

Evidence snapshot

The @melIstroytg assessment dated 2026-08-22 uses 22 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 57,621 subscribers, median post views were 15,462, ERR was 26.8%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

The recommendation is limited by manipulation risk: some views may be artificial.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 11,563–15,424 views.

What grade D means

The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.

Run a fresh check for @melIstroytg

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-22. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @melIstroytg

Questions about @melIstroytg

What does grade D mean for @melIstroytg?

The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.

What is the ERR of @melIstroytg?

ERR is 26.8%. Median post views equal 26.8% of the channel's 57,621 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 50/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @melIstroytg