Buy ads: https://telega.io/c/Market_MatrixFx
checked 2026-09-12
- Subscribers
- 6,332
- Median views
- 2,245
- ERR
- 35.5%
- Posts sampled
- 38
Assessment summary
Around 98% of posts have been deleted from the channel's message history, and comments are disabled, making it impossible to track genuine audience reactions. Against a high reach of over 35%, engagement remains extremely weak — fewer than 0.2% of viewers leave reactions. This combination points to likely artificial inflation of metrics, making advertising here questionable.
Compared with similar channels
Compared with 5 checked Trading channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 2,565 to 13,570 subscribers.
This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-09-12
- Sample
- The latest 38 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @Market_MatrixFx assessment dated 2026-09-12 uses 38 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 6,332 subscribers, median post views were 2,245, ERR was 35.5%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: questionable.
Some of the views may be fake.
About 1,123–2,245 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.
Reach of advertising posts
Too few advertising posts to compare: 2.
Without an ad label: 2 posts.
What grade D means
Clear signs of manipulation: several strong signals at once. Ads here are risky.
What to pay attention to
It seems some posts were deleted (≈98% gaps in numbering)
There are many gaps in the numbering of recent posts — some posts have been deleted. This is often done to hide completed ad campaigns and obscure their real reach. By itself, this is an indirect sign (posts are also deleted during edits).
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 38 posts with views, from Jan 8 to Sep 10. The dashed line is the median (2,245).
- post views
- median 2,245
Maximum: 5,570 views. Data as of Sep 12.
What could not be calculated
View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.
Data from 2026-09-12 — 8 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.
Buy advertising
No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.
We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.
Monitor this channel
The bot will recheck @Market_MatrixFx and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.
Monitor @Market_MatrixFxQuestions about @Market_MatrixFx
Why is placing ads in this channel considered questionable?
The channel received a risk score of 50 out of 100 due to signs of possible view boosting. In addition, massive deletion of old posts was detected in its history, which makes it difficult to assess audience stability.
What performance and reach can be expected from a post?
The median reach is around 2245 views per post. At the same time, engagement is very low: only a few leave reactions, so real human attention to an ad post may turn out to be weak.
What does the deletion of nearly 98% of posts indicate?
Large gaps in numbering indicate regular feed cleanups. Administrators often do this to hide traces of third-party ads or following an abrupt change in the channel's concept.
Similar channels in Trading
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
Other checked channels
- 97 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 70 · B
- 98 · A+
- 70 · B
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 90 · A
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.