TG Inspector TG Inspector

Fake engagement check for @javascript_jobs_feed

JavaScript Jobs — вакансии и резюме — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-06-18.

55/100
cleanliness index
Grade C
some signals require caution
Subscribers
14795
Median views
253
ERR
1.7%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Technology

Evidence snapshot

The @javascript_jobs_feed assessment dated 2026-06-18 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 14,795 subscribers, median post views were 253, ERR was 1.7%, and the cleanliness index was 55/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

A small share of subscribers sees each post, limiting likely advertising reach.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 202–261 views.

What grade C means

Several metrics require caution. They may indicate partially manipulated views or a passive audience, so advertising should be evaluated carefully.

Run a fresh check for @javascript_jobs_feed

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-06-18. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @javascript_jobs_feed

Questions about @javascript_jobs_feed

What does grade C mean for @javascript_jobs_feed?

Several metrics require caution. They may indicate partially manipulated views or a passive audience, so advertising should be evaluated carefully.

What is the ERR of @javascript_jobs_feed?

ERR is 1.7%. Median post views equal 1.7% of the channel's 14,795 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 55/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @javascript_jobs_feed