TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @glebovkapod

@glebovkapod: statistics and cleanliness index

Подслушано Глебовский | Истра

✧Подпишись!✧ ✍️ Прислать новость @istranewsbot ➥(укажите город, анон/ не анон) ➺ @coverus Купить рекламу: https://telega.in/c/glebovkapod

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-09
Subscribers
957
Median views
110
ERR
11.5%
Posts sampled
40
Niche News and Media

Data from 2026-09-09 — 29 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel is a small local platform without technical signs of boosting, where an advertiser can expect a narrow geographic reach of about 110 views per publication.

At the same time, over the last three months, the median views decreased from 201 to 110, and an intensive flow of operational alerts (an average of 5.7 publications per day) causes the post to quickly shift down the feed.

What to pay attention to

Outside spam in the comments

The comments look like spam and self-promotion from outside accounts. They are not written on behalf of the channel and do not affect the cleanliness index. Moderation or an anti-spam filter would help.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 67 News and Media catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 256 to 4,115,589 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 35 of 67
@glebovkapod 11.5%
similar channels median 12.4%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 41 of 60
@glebovkapod 0.91
similar channels median 1.31

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 1 to Sep 8. The dashed line is the median (110).

069138Sep 1: 118 viewsSep 1: 125 viewsSep 1: 127 viewsSep 1: 125 viewsSep 1: 101 viewsSep 1: 101 viewsSep 2: 105 viewsSep 2: 133 viewsSep 2: 121 viewsSep 2: 118 viewsSep 2: 110 viewsSep 2: 118 viewsSep 2: 116 viewsSep 2: 114 viewsSep 3: 109 viewsSep 3: 117 viewsSep 3: 103 viewsSep 3: 97 viewsSep 3: 97 viewsSep 3: 119 viewsSep 4: 122 viewsSep 4: 99 viewsSep 4: 111 viewsSep 4: 122 viewsSep 4: 129 viewsSep 4: 138 viewsSep 4: 114 viewsSep 4: 111 viewsSep 6: 91 viewsSep 6: 99 viewsSep 6: 109 viewsSep 6: 114 viewsSep 8: 86 viewsSep 8: 87 viewsSep 8: 74 viewsSep 8: 75 viewsSep 8: 71 viewsSep 8: 78 viewsSep 8: 68 viewsSep 8: 68 views Sep 1Sep 8
  • post views
  • median 110

Maximum: 138 views. Data as of Sep 9.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 13: index 100, grade A+Jun 13Sep 9: index 100, grade A+Sep 9

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @glebovkapod

Are there any signs of subscriber or view boosting on the channel?

The channel's risk score is 0 out of 100, no anomalies in views or reactions were found, but due to the small audience (957 subscribers), the detector's confidence is marked as low.

What reach can be expected when publishing?

The median reach of a single post is 110 views (ERR around 11.5%), but the advertiser should consider the decline in activity compared to the measurement from three months ago, when a post gathered about 201 views.

Does it make sense to buy advertising on this platform?

Placement is justified for local businesses in the Istra district and the village of Glebovsky; however, frequent similar alerts throughout the day quickly push the promotional post out of readers' view.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-09
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @glebovkapod assessment dated 2026-09-09 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 957 subscribers, median post views were 110, ERR was 11.5%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.