Fake engagement check for @foxart_lisich2000
LISICH — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-25.
Щит пост: https://t.me/foxlisichhouse
Assessment summary
This is an original art blog with an engaged fandom audience: a reach exceeding 100% of the subscriber base and a high reaction rate (11.3% of views) are driven by organic forwards of original artwork. Given the infrequent posting (0.4 posts per day) and the complete absence of third-party ads, an ad will stay in view for a long time, though one should expect a reach of around 390 views within a narrow gaming segment.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-08-25
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @foxart_lisich2000 assessment dated 2026-08-25 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 326 subscribers, median post views were 392, ERR was 120.2%, and the cleanliness index was 98/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: reasonable.
There are not enough posts for a reach forecast.
Reach of advertising posts
No advertising posts were found among the latest 40 posts, so there is nothing to compare.
What grade A+ means
The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from May 19 to Aug 25. The dashed line is the median (392).
- post views
- 1 post newer than one day and still gaining views
- median 392
The sample maximum is 1,469 views. Snapshot dated Aug 25; the axis is not clipped, so spikes remain visible.
The view-dispersion and maturation signals were available and found no deviations. This is not a guarantee: use the complete cleanliness index.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once, so there is nothing to compare yet. The chart will appear after another check.
This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-25. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.
Buy advertising
The channel does not appear to be in the high-risk zone. These marketplaces provide channel catalogs, pricing, and payment on their own platforms.
TG Inspector does not sell placements or participate in the transaction. A specific channel may be absent from a marketplace.
Monitor this channel
Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.
Monitor @foxart_lisich2000Questions about @foxart_lisich2000
Are there any signs of audience boosting on the channel?
No, the channel has a minimal risk score of 2 out of 100. Audience engagement is high: reactions account for over 11% of views, and comments are open for interaction.
Why is the median view count higher than the subscriber count?
The median figure of 392 views with 326 subscribers is driven by forwards of original art and comics to themed chats and external channels.
How worthwhile is it to buy advertising here?
Placement is justified for promoting products in the gaming or creative niche. There is no commercial advertising in the feed, and the low posting frequency ensures the publication will stay at the top for a long time.
Other checked channels
This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.