TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @fotobudka_ai

@fotobudka_ai: statistics and cleanliness index

Фотобудка ИИ | тренды и нейросети | контент ИИ | шотикс | пингвин | чиз

Здесь мы исследуем тренды в социальных сетях, делимся полезными советами по созданию контента и работе с нейросетями. ♥️ создай ИИ-фото: @fotobudka_ai_bot 📷 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/fotobudka.ai идентификатор № 5469586614

Share this report
Telegram

Grade B metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-01
Subscribers
32,555
Median views
8,975
ERR
27.6%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Computer science

Data from 2026-09-01 — 37 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel is deeply inactive — the last post was made over 5 months ago (156 days), making ad placement questionable regardless of the formal risk score.

Abnormally uniform views (CV 0.15) combined with disabled comments and a tiny share of reactions (0.19% of views) indicate a lack of genuine audience interaction.

What to pay attention to

Views are more even than usual (CV ≈ 0.15)

Views vary less between posts than is usual for channels (0.15–0.6): posts collect almost the same number of views.

What grade B means

Metrics are mostly normal; one or two weak signals lower the index.

Channel content

🤖 Possible AI-generated content

The posts consist of repetitive instructions and AI-generated visuals created to promote their own bot.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 33 Computer science catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 11,340 to 92,057 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 28 of 33
@fotobudka_ai 27.6%
similar channels median 8.4%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 25 of 30
@fotobudka_ai 0.19
similar channels median 0.39

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Feb 19 to Mar 29. The dashed line is the median (8,975).

05K10KFeb 19: 10,020 viewsFeb 19: 10,037 viewsFeb 19: 10,006 viewsFeb 19: 9,003 viewsFeb 24: 10,092 viewsFeb 24: 10,091 viewsFeb 24: 9,717 viewsFeb 24: 9,236 viewsFeb 24: 9,319 viewsFeb 24: 9,325 viewsMar 15: 6,110 viewsMar 15: 6,118 viewsMar 15: 6,596 viewsMar 15: 6,782 viewsMar 15: 6,439 viewsMar 15: 6,039 viewsMar 15: 6,716 viewsMar 15: 6,575 viewsMar 15: 7,130 viewsMar 15: 7,746 viewsMar 15: 7,225 viewsMar 15: 6,614 viewsMar 16: 8,994 viewsMar 16: 9,091 viewsMar 16: 9,565 viewsMar 16: 8,384 viewsMar 16: 8,528 viewsMar 16: 8,425 viewsMar 23: 8,973 viewsMar 23: 8,952 viewsMar 23: 8,978 viewsMar 23: 8,445 viewsMar 23: 8,451 viewsMar 23: 8,402 viewsMar 29: 9,420 viewsMar 29: 9,279 viewsMar 29: 9,256 viewsMar 29: 9,152 viewsMar 29: 9,152 viewsMar 29: 9,195 views Feb 19Mar 29
  • post views
  • median 8,975

Maximum: 10,092 views. Data as of Sep 1.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Views are more even than usual (CV ≈ 0.15)

Views vary less between posts than is usual for channels (0.15–0.6): posts collect almost the same number of views.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 30: index 95, grade A+Jun 30Sep 1: index 70, grade BSep 1

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

The channel has gone quiet — ask the owner when the next post is due.

No new posts for over two weeks, so ad reach can't be forecast right now.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @fotobudka_ai

What is the risk of artificial boosting on this channel?

The channel's risk score is in the green zone (30 out of 100); however, suspiciously uniform views (CV 0.15) and disabled comments indicate the likelihood of partial boosting.

Why is advertising considered questionable?

The main reason is the prolonged inactivity of the channel: no fresh posts have been published for over 156 days, so there is currently no active reading audience on the channel.

What are the real audience engagement metrics?

The formal reach is about 8,975 views per post (ERR 27.57%), but reactions are left by only 0.038% of the entire subscriber base, and comments/feedback are closed.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-01
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @fotobudka_ai assessment dated 2026-09-01 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 32,555 subscribers, median post views were 8,975, ERR was 27.6%, and the cleanliness index was 70/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.