checked 2026-09-10
- Subscribers
- 1,836
- Median views
- 1,607
- ERR
- 87.5%
- Posts sampled
- 38
Assessment summary
The high reach of 1,600 views with a subscriber base of 1,836 is driven by a seasonal peak in student activity in September around the course platform. With a moderate posting frequency of 2.7 posts per day and an even distribution of views (CV 0.32), the advertising post captures the feed's attention and does not get lost in the flow. Discussions in open comments are currently formed by a core of 20 active authors, which is normal for a small service community.
Compared with similar channels
Compared with 14 checked Education channels with no visible signs of manipulation. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 69 to 465,428 subscribers.
This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-09-10
- Sample
- The latest 38 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @egeball2027 assessment dated 2026-09-10 uses 38 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 1,836 subscribers, median post views were 1,607, ERR was 87.5%, and the cleanliness index was 95/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: reasonable.
About 804–843 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.
Reach of advertising posts
Too few advertising posts to compare: 2.
What grade A+ means
Almost no signs of manipulation: reactions look real and reach matches the subscriber count. The safest place for ads.
What to pay attention to
Comments are written by a narrow circle of accounts (20 out of 63)
The share of unique authors among comments is low—the discussion is sustained by a small group of accounts. This may be an active core, but it is worth checking whether it is artificial inflation.
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 38 posts with views, from Aug 27 to Sep 10. The dashed line is the median (1,607).
- post views
- 4 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
- median 1,607
Maximum: 3,813 views. Data as of Sep 10.
No deviations found in views. Manipulation doesn't always show up in views, so look at the whole index.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.
Data from 2026-09-10 — 10 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.
Buy advertising
No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.
We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.
Monitor this channel
The bot will recheck @egeball2027 and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.
Monitor @egeball2027Questions about @egeball2027
Are there any signs of audience boosting on the channel?
The channel is clean: the risk score is only 5 out of 100, and the natural distribution of views (CV 0.32) confirms genuine subscriber interest.
What real reach will an advertising post get?
The median view count stands at 1,607 per post with a total subscriber base of 1,836, providing an audience reach of about 87%.
Why is placement here considered justified?
There is virtually no third-party advertising in the feed (about 5%), comments are open, and a posting frequency of up to 3 posts per day allows the ad to remain visible.
Similar channels in Education
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 99 · A+
- 96 · A+
Other checked channels
- 97 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 70 · B
- 98 · A+
- 70 · B
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 90 · A
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.