TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @dfzwe4

@dfzwe4: statistics and cleanliness index

Гусь

Вас обижает пост или вы автор — пишите @ggooss в лс. По поводу рекламы только сюда: @ggooss Менеджер: @aiphariusomegon В конкурсах не участвуем, менеджеров больше нет. Другие каналы: @ocpochmac / @gvstk / @pla4ut_nebeca

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-02
Subscribers
27,830
Median views
6,292
ERR
22.6%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Humor & Memes

Data from 2026-09-02 — 37 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel's audience appears completely organic: the risk score is minimal, comments are open, and posts consistently gather feedback in the form of reactions.

However, with an intensity of around 19 posts per day, the feed operates like an assembly line, causing an ad post to be quickly pushed down by new content and lose readers' attention.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 11 Humor & Memes catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 12,162 to 81,465 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 7 of 11
@dfzwe4 22.6%
similar channels median 18.1%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 11 of 11
@dfzwe4 5.18
similar channels median 2.19

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 31 to Sep 2. The dashed line is the median (6,292).

03.7K7.3KAug 31: 6,773 viewsAug 31: 6,898 viewsAug 31: 6,888 viewsAug 31: 6,858 viewsAug 31: 6,826 viewsAug 31: 6,761 viewsAug 31: 6,777 viewsAug 31: 6,762 viewsAug 31: 7,338 viewsAug 31: 6,919 viewsAug 31: 6,769 viewsAug 31: 7,107 viewsAug 31: 6,687 viewsAug 31: 6,984 viewsAug 31: 6,637 viewsSep 1: 6,558 viewsSep 1: 6,292 viewsSep 1: 6,453 viewsSep 1: 6,537 viewsSep 1: 6,318 viewsSep 1: 6,235 viewsSep 1: 6,204 viewsSep 1: 6,292 viewsSep 1: 6,066 viewsSep 1: 6,081 viewsSep 1: 5,985 viewsSep 1: 5,791 viewsSep 1: 5,634 viewsSep 1: 5,691 viewsSep 2: 4,727 viewsSep 2: 4,470 viewsSep 2: 4,535 viewsSep 2: 4,269 viewsSep 2: 3,547 viewsSep 2: 3,553 viewsSep 2: 3,420 viewsSep 2: 2,861 viewsSep 2: 2,813 viewsSep 2: 970 viewsSep 2: 1,015 views Aug 31Sep 2
  • post views
  • 20 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 6,292

Maximum: 7,338 views. Data as of Sep 2.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 13: index 99, grade A+Jun 13Sep 2: index 99, grade A+Sep 2

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

So many posts that an ad quickly slides down the feed.

About 4,319–6,419 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @dfzwe4

Are there any signs of fake engagement on the channel?

No, the channel shows natural metrics: the risk score is 1 out of 100, comments are open, and views are distributed without sharp anomalies.

What is the real reach of the posts?

The median reach is around 6.3k views per post (ERR around 22.6%), and reaction engagement holds at 5.2% of views.

Why is ad placement considered questionable?

The reason is the high posting frequency (19 posts per day), which causes an ad post to quickly move down the feed and risk not getting enough attention.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-02
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @dfzwe4 assessment dated 2026-09-02 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 27,830 subscribers, median post views were 6,292, ERR was 22.6%, and the cleanliness index was 99/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.