TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @daily_free_internet

Fake engagement check for @daily_free_internet

DAILY | ነፃ ኢንተርኔት | CRYPTO — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-25.

I blog about marketing and sales Buy ads: https://telega.io/c/daily_free_internet

97/100
cleanliness index
Grade A+
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
33537
Median views
6935
ERR
20.7%
Posts sampled
40

Assessment summary

The channel demonstrates stable engagement metrics without signs of artificial boosting, with a median of around 6.9K views per post. However, the high posting frequency (almost 11 posts per day) quickly pushes posts out of subscribers' view, which shortens the reach accumulation period and makes the return on standard placement questionable.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-08-25
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @daily_free_internet assessment dated 2026-08-25 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 33,537 subscribers, median post views were 6,935, ERR was 20.7%, and the cleanliness index was 97/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Posts are published very frequently, so an advertisement may move down the feed quickly.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 5,243–6,551 views.

Reach of advertising posts

Advertising posts have a median of 7,667 views versus 7,467 for regular posts — 3% higher.

Based on 3 advertising and 15 regular posts older than two days.

What grade A+ means

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 22 to Aug 25. The dashed line is the median (6,935).

04.3K8.5KAug 22: 8,548 viewsAug 22: 8,318 viewsAug 22: 8,206 viewsAug 22: 7,497 viewsAug 22: 7,667 viewsAug 22: 7,381 viewsAug 22: 7,600 viewsAug 22: 8,023 viewsAug 23: 7,659 viewsAug 23: 7,467 viewsAug 23: 6,947 viewsAug 23: 7,478 viewsAug 23: 7,436 viewsAug 23: 6,833 viewsAug 23: 7,011 viewsAug 23: 6,999 viewsAug 23: 7,393 viewsAug 23: 7,370 viewsAug 24: 7,267 viewsAug 24: 6,946 viewsAug 24: 6,616 viewsAug 24: 6,494 viewsAug 24: 6,941 viewsAug 24: 6,930 viewsAug 24: 6,527 viewsAug 24: 6,459 viewsAug 24: 6,547 viewsAug 24: 6,389 viewsAug 24: 6,552 viewsAug 25: 5,774 viewsAug 25: 5,573 viewsAug 25: 5,350 viewsAug 25: 5,609 viewsAug 25: 5,443 viewsAug 25: 5,207 viewsAug 25: 5,168 viewsAug 25: 4,402 viewsAug 25: 4,010 viewsAug 25: 661 viewsAug 25: 491 views Aug 22Aug 25

The sample maximum is 8,548 views. Snapshot dated Aug 25; the axis is not clipped, so spikes remain visible.

What could not be calculated

View maturation was not assessed: the channel publishes frequently, and every sampled post is newer than one week.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once, so there is nothing to compare yet. The chart will appear after another check.

Run a fresh check for @daily_free_internet

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-25. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Buy advertising

The channel does not appear to be in the high-risk zone. These marketplaces provide channel catalogs, pricing, and payment on their own platforms.

TG Inspector does not sell placements or participate in the transaction. A specific channel may be absent from a marketplace.

These are affiliate links: TG Inspector may receive a commission. This does not affect the cleanliness index.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @daily_free_internet

Questions about @daily_free_internet

Were any signs of artificial boosting detected on the channel?

No, the risk score is 3 out of 100, and the stable variance of views (CV 0.26) indicates natural audience behavior.

How many views does a post get?

The median reach is around 6.9K views per post (ERR ~20.7%), and sponsored posts show close values (median 7.6K).

Why is the feasibility of ad placement considered questionable?

Due to the high posting frequency (about 11 posts per day), an ad post is quickly pushed down the feed, which reduces the duration of contact with readers.

Similar channels in Computer science

All channels in Computer science

Other checked channels

@yuriifrost@infokrasot@mskchpa@onlineodds1@realmadrid_aficcionados@binanceredpacket_code@earn_tips@sky_sports_football_updates@pavlovstars@crypto_scalp_signals@adsgram_ai@tradingkattadubai

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @daily_free_internet