TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @CryptoHylos

@CryptoHylos: statistics and cleanliness index

CryptoHylos 🍀 - Official

My trades and my story. Cooperation: @Agelta

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-30
Subscribers
1,563,890
Median views
76,482
ERR
4.9%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Cryptocurrencies
Post language English
Channel age 3 years

Data from 2026-09-30 — 9 days old.

Assessment summary

An English-language trader's blog featuring trade reports and crypto exchange promo bonus giveaways.

Only a small fraction of the audience reads posts here: an ERR of 4.9% is lower than the metrics of 25 out of 29 similar channels in the directory, and about one hundred thousand people unsubscribed over the past month. The channel is updated extremely rarely, so advertising placement is debatable due to low reach.

What to pay attention to

Some messages were deleted: ≈69% of IDs skipped

There are many gaps in the numbering of the channel's recent messages — some of them have been deleted. Message IDs are counted rather than posts: each photo in an album has its own ID. Deleted posts are not visible, so the channel can only be partially evaluated based on the remaining ones.

What grade A means

Metrics look normal: no signals lowering the index were found, or they are weak.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 38 Cryptocurrencies catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 35 to 1,230,938 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 33 of 38
@CryptoHylos 4.9%
similar channels median 16.9%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 31 of 36
@CryptoHylos 0.36
similar channels median 1.15

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Jan 30 to Aug 1. The dashed line is the median (76,482).

064K127KJan 30: 66,239 viewsJan 31: 66,386 viewsFeb 3: 78,440 viewsFeb 7: 83,238 viewsFeb 12: 73,044 viewsFeb 15: 64,077 viewsFeb 21: 81,045 viewsFeb 28: 78,564 viewsMar 2: 86,323 viewsMar 14: 75,916 viewsMar 17: 85,461 viewsMar 23: 86,316 viewsMar 26: 91,906 viewsApr 7: 97,058 viewsApr 14: 89,378 viewsMay 11: 94,167 viewsOct 10: 30,947 viewsOct 11: 33,062 viewsOct 15: 44,801 viewsOct 19: 40,264 viewsOct 20: 45,345 viewsNov 1: 53,507 viewsNov 5: 53,695 viewsNov 10: 62,687 viewsDec 3: 89,329 viewsFeb 6: 121,477 viewsJun 13: 119,282 viewsJun 21: 127,222 viewsJun 26: 125,196 viewsJul 3: 61,657 viewsJul 4: 67,668 viewsJul 5: 71,739 viewsJul 10: 57,009 viewsJul 11: 78,290 viewsJul 14: 95,041 viewsJul 16: 124,214 viewsJul 25: 73,681 viewsJul 29: 77,049 viewsJul 29: 59,263 viewsAug 1: 64,795 views Jan 30Aug 1
  • post views
  • median 76,482

Maximum: 127,222 views. Data as of Sep 30.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Aug 25: index 50, grade DAug 25Sep 12: index 50, grade DSep 12Sep 30: index 82, grade ASep 30

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 2.

Without an ad label: 1 post.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @CryptoHylos

What is the purity index of the CryptoHylos channel?

The channel's purity index is 82 out of 100 (grade A, "normal metrics" level). This indicator reflects the absence of critical anomalies in view distribution, despite the skipped post IDs.

Why is the feasibility of advertising placement assessed as debatable?

The reason is low relative reach: posts are viewed by a small share of the audience (ERR around 4.9%). In addition, the feed is practically abandoned, with a new post appearing on average once every ten days.

How is audience attention distributed across posts?

Median views stay around 76 thousand, but reactions account for only 0.36% of this number. Comments on posts are completely closed, so there is no feedback from readers in the feed.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-30
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @CryptoHylos assessment dated 2026-09-30 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 1,563,890 subscribers, median post views were 76,482, ERR was 4.9%, and the cleanliness index was 82/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.