TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @crypto_iceENG

@crypto_iceENG: statistics and cleanliness index

Crypto ICE™

Crypto-currency pro ⛏️ Feedback: @ice_feedback

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-08-25
Subscribers
36,820
Median views
6,028
ERR
16.4%
Posts sampled
40

Data from 2026-08-25 — 44 days old.

Assessment summary

With a low posting frequency (about one post every three days), the channel maintains a stable reach of around 6 thousand views with no signs of sharp anomalies, although the audience has gradually decreased by 2.1 thousand people over 74 days.

Disabled comments and a high share of deleted posts (about 25%) are typical for single-product showcases, where content is regularly cleared and does not involve public discussion.

What to pay attention to

Comments are disabled on a large channel

Comments are disabled on a channel with over 10 thousand subscribers. Weak signal: this is sometimes done to hide the lack of an active audience.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Channel content

🚩 Possible scam or deception signals

The entire feed is dedicated to selling software for automated brute-forcing and hacking of other people's cryptocurrency wallets, accompanied by promises of guaranteed income, refunds, and screenshots of dubious reviews.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 12 Cryptocurrencies catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 15,129 to 80,509 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 8 of 12
@crypto_iceENG 16.4%
similar channels median 11.6%

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Mar 26 to Aug 24. The dashed line is the median (6,028).

04.4K8.8KMar 26: 7,187 viewsApr 6: 7,591 viewsApr 21: 6,092 viewsApr 21: 6,264 viewsApr 22: 7,479 viewsMay 5: 6,651 viewsMay 12: 5,847 viewsMay 12: 7,747 viewsMay 25: 6,792 viewsMay 25: 7,823 viewsMay 28: 8,756 viewsJun 12: 5,213 viewsJun 15: 4,486 viewsJun 15: 6,288 viewsJun 15: 5,862 viewsJun 15: 4,838 viewsJun 15: 5,964 viewsJun 15: 5,731 viewsJun 16: 6,762 viewsJun 22: 6,883 viewsJun 23: 7,827 viewsJun 24: 7,355 viewsJun 24: 6,654 viewsJun 27: 7,194 viewsJul 6: 5,527 viewsJul 6: 5,323 viewsJul 7: 5,677 viewsJul 8: 6,705 viewsJul 9: 7,062 viewsJul 16: 6,795 viewsJul 22: 5,632 viewsJul 31: 4,889 viewsAug 8: 4,146 viewsAug 17: 2,456 viewsAug 17: 2,419 viewsAug 19: 2,126 viewsAug 19: 2,203 viewsAug 21: 1,614 viewsAug 22: 1,281 viewsAug 24: 643 views Mar 26Aug 24
  • post views
  • 1 post newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 6,028

Maximum: 8,756 views. Data as of Aug 25.

No deviations in views. Views are only part of the metrics, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 11: index 94, grade A+Jun 11Aug 25: index 95, grade A+Aug 25

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

About 1,219–2,438 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @crypto_iceENG

What is the risk of metric manipulation on this channel?

The channel's risk score is 5 out of 100, indicating the absence of technical signs of view inflation and a natural variance in reach metrics.

What reach do publications generate?

The median reach is 6,028 views per post (ERR around 16.37%) with infrequent posting approximately once every three days.

Is advertising placement justified?

Based on technical metrics, placement is considered justified; however, the advertiser should take into account disabled comments and the specific nature of the promotional sales content in the feed.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-08-25
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @crypto_iceENG assessment dated 2026-08-25 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 36,820 subscribers, median post views were 6,028, ERR was 16.4%, and the cleanliness index was 95/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.