TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @Crazy_Women1

@Crazy_Women1: statistics and cleanliness index

Crazy Women

https://t.me/+g0F009nZtj05Zjc0 //Admin channel @Sdlg0 //

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-08
Subscribers
9,239
Median views
2,268
ERR
24.5%
Posts sampled
38

Data from 2026-09-08 — 30 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel demonstrates organic metrics without signs of artificial boosting: a moderate frequency of 3.3 posts per day allows an advertising post to stay at the top of the feed for several hours.

The main factor for an advertiser is the decrease in median reach from 3882 to 2268 views over the past three months with a stable subscriber base, so the integration cost should be calculated based on the current engagement level.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 16 Recreation & Entertainment catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 4,480 to 27,546 subscribers.

ERR (reach) at the median
@Crazy_Women1 24.5%
similar channels median 26.1%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 11 of 16
@Crazy_Women1 0.57
similar channels median 1.01

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 38 posts with views, from Aug 28 to Sep 8. The dashed line is the median (2,268).

02.1K4.2KAug 28: 2,483 viewsAug 28: 2,445 viewsAug 28: 2,837 viewsAug 28: 3,254 viewsAug 28: 3,224 viewsAug 29: 3,356 viewsAug 29: 3,555 viewsAug 29: 3,916 viewsAug 30: 4,173 viewsAug 30: 3,906 viewsAug 30: 3,745 viewsAug 31: 3,576 viewsAug 31: 3,742 viewsAug 31: 3,831 viewsAug 31: 4,122 viewsSep 1: 3,958 viewsSep 1: 3,811 viewsSep 1: 2,657 viewsSep 2: 2,363 viewsSep 2: 2,038 viewsSep 2: 2,173 viewsSep 3: 2,159 viewsSep 3: 2,106 viewsSep 3: 1,740 viewsSep 4: 1,220 viewsSep 4: 1,101 viewsSep 5: 947 viewsSep 5: 843 viewsSep 6: 810 viewsSep 6: 694 viewsSep 6: 745 viewsSep 7: 664 viewsSep 7: 671 viewsSep 7: 588 viewsSep 7: 539 viewsSep 8: 337 viewsSep 8: 128 viewsSep 8: 54 views Aug 28Sep 8
  • post views
  • 3 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 2,268

Maximum: 4,173 views. Data as of Sep 8.

No deviations in views. Views are only part of the metrics, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 11: index 93, grade A+Jun 11Sep 8: index 98, grade A+Sep 8

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

About 581–666 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 0. 2 more are too fresh.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @Crazy_Women1

Is it safe to buy advertising on the Crazy Women channel?

Yes, the audit showed a minimal risk score of 2 out of 100, open comments, and no signs of audience boosting.

What reach will the ad post get?

The median reach is about 2268 views per post (ERR around 24.5%), with views declining from 3882 over the last 88 days.

Is the channel's format suitable for integrations?

Placement is considered justified: the feed is not overloaded with ads (only 5% in the sample), and the low posting frequency (3.3 per day) preserves post visibility.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-08
Sample
The latest 38 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @Crazy_Women1 assessment dated 2026-09-08 uses 38 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 9,239 subscribers, median post views were 2,268, ERR was 24.5%, and the cleanliness index was 98/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.