TG Inspector TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @butdaaady

@butdaaady: statistics and cleanliness index

Please, daddy

Share this report
Telegram

Grade D some metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-18
Subscribers
142,924
Median views
10,725
ERR
7.5%
Posts sampled
40
Niche NSFW 18+
Post language Russian 83% of posts
Channel age 8 years

Data from 2026-10-18 — 19 days old.

Assessment summary

Explicit 18+ content — videos and photos; the channel has been run for eight years and publishes an average of 16 posts per day.

With such a flow, the ad quickly moves down the feed, and a smaller share of subscribers sees a post than in a similar catalog channel; reactions gather less than a percent of views. In addition, Telegram restricted the channel for distributing pornographic content.

About the channel

“Please, daddy” is a channel with explicit adult content: the feed contains 18+ videos and photos, there is almost no text, and captions are short. It has been run for eight years, and posts are in Russian.

Next to it in the catalog is @aesthetic_room58 — a female body aesthetics channel. It has many times fewer subscribers, but a noticeably larger share of its audience sees a post there: ERR 33.6% versus 7.5% for this channel.

Posts are published mainly during the day (40%) and in the evening (30%), and almost two-thirds of publications fall on weekends. Part of the feed consists of reposts from other 18+ channels, for example “$TAYHOME 18+”, “Sakura in Bloom 🌸”, and “The girls buzz”. The feed is updated on a conveyor — about 16 posts per day, with reposts and rare ad inserts.

By subscribers, it ranks #1 of 18 channels in the NSFW 18+ niche of the catalog.

What to pay attention to

Telegram restricted the channel (restricted)

The platform imposed restrictions on the channel for violating the rules. Reason: This channel can’t be displayed because it was used to spread pornographic content..

What grade D means

The index is clearly lowered: one or more metrics fall outside usual values. The “How the assessment was produced” section shows which ones.

Channel content

⚠️ Mixed content signals

The feed contains ad inserts with links to third-party channels and bots, as well as bait posts like “free premium” — such offers usually lead to third-party bots.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 9 NSFW 18+ catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 181 to 60,281 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 8 of 9
@butdaaady 7.5%
similar channels median 28%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 6 of 9
@butdaaady 0.94
similar channels median 0.48

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Scroll horizontally to see the full charts.

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Oct 16 to Oct 18. The dashed line is the median (10,725).

07.9K16KOct 16: 14,022 viewsOct 16: 13,877 viewsOct 16: 15,878 viewsOct 16: 14,029 viewsOct 16: 14,132 viewsOct 16: 13,778 viewsOct 16: 13,749 viewsOct 16: 13,526 viewsOct 16: 13,495 viewsOct 16: 13,339 viewsOct 16: 13,821 viewsOct 16: 15,081 viewsOct 16: 12,645 viewsOct 17: 11,413 viewsOct 17: 10,908 viewsOct 17: 11,008 viewsOct 17: 11,215 viewsOct 17: 10,762 viewsOct 17: 10,797 viewsOct 17: 10,689 viewsOct 17: 10,147 viewsOct 17: 10,090 viewsOct 17: 9,715 viewsOct 17: 9,780 viewsOct 17: 11,247 viewsOct 17: 9,224 viewsOct 18: 6,811 viewsOct 18: 7,886 viewsOct 18: 6,427 viewsOct 18: 6,777 viewsOct 18: 6,253 viewsOct 18: 5,532 viewsOct 18: 5,449 viewsOct 18: 4,991 viewsOct 18: 4,503 viewsOct 18: 4,013 viewsOct 18: 3,422 viewsOct 18: 2,945 viewsOct 18: 2,181 viewsOct 18: 1,133 views Oct 16Oct 18
  • post views
  • 15 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 10,725

Maximum: 15,878 views. Data as of Oct 18.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel's data has been collected once — the chart will appear after the next update.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

So many posts that an ad quickly slides down the feed.

About 6,900–10,771 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 0. 8 more are too fresh.

Without an ad label: 6 posts.

Questions about @butdaaady

What does the purity index of 45 out of 100 mean for @butdaaady?

This is grade D, the “there are deviations” level: the higher the index, the fewer deviations. Here the index is reduced, including because of Telegram’s restriction for distributing pornographic content.

What share of subscribers sees a post in this channel?

The median views are about 10.7 thousand with 143 thousand subscribers, i.e., ERR is approximately 7.5%. This is a smaller share of the audience than for a similar catalog channel.

Is it worth placing ads here?

The advisability of placement is marked as debatable: the feed is published on a conveyor, about 16 posts per day, and the ad quickly moves down. The decision on placement remains with the advertiser.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-18
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @butdaaady assessment dated 2026-10-18 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 142,924 subscribers, median post views were 10,725, ERR was 7.5%, and the cleanliness index was 45/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/obsessed_with_ai.