TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Channel unavailable The channel has almost no posts left, so it cannot be scored again. The figures and score below are as of the last check, 2026-09-10.
Avatar of @BishkaTG

@BishkaTG: statistics and cleanliness index

Bishka | Бишкус

ДАРОВА, Братанчики! Вэлком в реальную жизнь Бишки! 🤫🧏‍♂️ 📩 Реклама в ТГК: @ad_manager100

Share this report
Telegram

Grade D some metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-10
Subscribers
69,320
Median views
36,181
ERR
52.2%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Blogs

Data from 2026-09-10 — 28 days old.

Assessment summary

An abnormal skew of reactions toward a single emoji (91%) and view growth from 27k to 36k during audience churn suggest possible metrics inflation.

Frequent deletion of publications (about 42% of posts cleared) is an additional concern, presenting a risk that an advertiser's post might be deleted quickly or that traffic is not entirely authentic.

What to pay attention to

Almost all reactions are of one type (91%)

Almost all reactions are the same emoji, although other reactions are used in the channel too. Reactions are usually more varied.

What grade D means

The index is clearly lowered: one or more metrics fall outside usual values. The “How the assessment was produced” section shows which ones.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 8 Blogs catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 57,440 to 165,870 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 5 of 8
@BishkaTG 52.2%
similar channels median 33.5%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 5 of 8
@BishkaTG 5.15
similar channels median 2.71

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 2 to Sep 10. The dashed line is the median (36,181).

031K63KAug 2: 31,661 viewsAug 2: 49,812 viewsAug 2: 56,966 viewsAug 4: 44,397 viewsAug 6: 38,500 viewsAug 6: 46,539 viewsAug 7: 54,694 viewsAug 7: 47,786 viewsAug 7: 62,587 viewsAug 11: 48,322 viewsAug 13: 42,595 viewsAug 14: 37,925 viewsAug 14: 40,205 viewsAug 15: 35,750 viewsAug 17: 34,751 viewsAug 18: 30,146 viewsAug 18: 27,601 viewsAug 18: 33,659 viewsAug 19: 29,845 viewsAug 19: 35,885 viewsAug 19: 36,204 viewsAug 20: 38,412 viewsAug 21: 38,900 viewsAug 21: 39,587 viewsAug 21: 37,604 viewsAug 25: 36,158 viewsAug 25: 34,168 viewsAug 26: 41,574 viewsAug 28: 37,879 viewsAug 28: 37,505 viewsAug 29: 31,272 viewsAug 31: 24,993 viewsSep 1: 22,481 viewsSep 1: 19,969 viewsSep 1: 8,700 viewsSep 3: 24,397 viewsSep 3: 24,480 viewsSep 5: 19,677 viewsSep 6: 17,718 viewsSep 10: 6,181 views Aug 2Sep 10
  • post views
  • 1 post newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 36,181

Maximum: 62,587 views. Data as of Sep 10.

No deviations in views. Views are only part of the metrics, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Aug 11: index 92, grade A+Aug 11Sep 10: index 50, grade DSep 10

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Some of the channel's metrics deviate, so it is hard to say in advance how many people will see an ad.

About 11,720–23,439 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 1. 1 more are too fresh.

Without an ad label: 1 post.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @BishkaTG

Is it safe to buy ads in this channel?

The risk is assessed as medium (50 out of 100), and placement is considered questionable. The channel shows a 91% concentration of reactions on a single emoji and frequent post deletions, indicating the likelihood of partial inflation.

What reach will a publication achieve?

The median reach is about 36 thousand views with a high ERR exceeding 52%. However, due to signs of inflation, part of this volume may be generated by bots rather than genuine readers.

Why is ad placement considered questionable?

The reason for this verdict is the risk of partial view inflation. In addition, the deletion of nearly half of recent posts creates uncertainty regarding the lifespan of an ad post in the feed.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-10
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @BishkaTG assessment dated 2026-09-10 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 69,320 subscribers, median post views were 36,181, ERR was 52.2%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.