TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @balckgip1

@balckgip1: statistics and cleanliness index

Blackgipl

Share this report
Telegram

Grade B metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-09
Subscribers
9
Median views
880
ERR
9777.8%
Posts sampled
5
Niche Marketing & PR

Little data, so this is a rough estimate.

Data from 2026-09-09 — 29 days old.

Assessment summary

This is a narrow showcase channel for chatbot development services rather than a regularly maintained topical feed.

The combination of view counts that exceed the base of nine subscribers many times over and almost identical metrics across posts does not allow these views to be considered sustainable ad reach; moreover, the channel has not been updated for 115 days, making placement here questionable precisely due to inactivity.

What to pay attention to

Views are more even than usual (CV ≈ 0.05)

Views vary less between posts than is usual for channels (0.15–0.6): posts collect almost the same number of views.

What grade B means

Metrics are mostly normal; one or two weak signals lower the index.

Channel content

📣 Heavy advertising load

The feed primarily showcases and promotes chatbot and sales funnel development services.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 18 Marketing & PR catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 1,022 to 652,998 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 18 of 18
@balckgip1 9777.8%
similar channels median 10.2%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 8 of 15
@balckgip1 2.13
similar channels median 1.39

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 5 posts with views, from Apr 22 to May 17. The dashed line is the median (880).

0445890Apr 22: 880 viewsApr 22: 880 viewsApr 22: 880 viewsApr 22: 890 viewsMay 17: 772 views Apr 22May 17
  • post views
  • median 880

Maximum: 890 views. Data as of Sep 9.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Views are more even than usual (CV ≈ 0.05)

Views vary less between posts than is usual for channels (0.15–0.6): posts collect almost the same number of views.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jul 2: index 70, grade BJul 2Sep 9: index 70, grade BSep 9

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

The channel has gone quiet — ask the owner when the next post is due.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 1.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @balckgip1

What is the channel's fraud risk?

The check yielded a green risk score of 30 out of 100, but confidence in the assessment is low due to the very small subscriber base. Among the findings, suspiciously even post views were noted.

How do views compare to subscribers?

The median view count is 880 with nine subscribers, and the ERR is about 9778%. Such reach is significantly higher than the base size, so the source of the views is unclear.

Is the channel suitable for buying ads?

Placement is marked as questionable: the channel has been inactive for a long time and has not published posts for 115 days. An ad post reach forecast was not calculated because there are too few ad posts in the sample.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-09
Sample
The latest 5 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @balckgip1 assessment dated 2026-09-09 uses 5 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 9 subscribers, median post views were 880, ERR was 9777.8%, and the cleanliness index was 70/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.