TG Inspector TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @turkamatorturbanlivip

@turkamatorturbanlivip: statistics and cleanliness index

TÜRK AMATÖR & TÜRBANLI VİP

Share this report
Telegram

Grade F many metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-20
Subscribers
1,579
Median views
4,979
ERR
315.3%
Posts sampled
40
Niche NSFW 18+
Post language Turkish
Channel age 2 months

Data from 2026-10-20 — 18 days old.

Assessment summary

Turkish adult channel: explicit photos and videos plus selling access to private VIP channels via invite links; it has been running for only 49 days.

Posts get more views than the channel has subscribers, but there are almost no reactions — 0.05% of views at such reach looks unusual, and about 22% of message IDs in the recent posts window are missing. Placement is marked as questionable due to the purity index: the channel has deviations in its metrics, so it is hard to say in advance how many people will see the ad.

About the channel

Turkish-language channel for an adult audience: explicit photos and videos shot at home, and compilations of clips from private channels. It has been running recently — about a month and a half; the feed is almost entirely visual: about half of the posts are photos, a third are videos, and there are almost no text notes.

What it publishes:

  • Explicit photos and videos: amateur shots and clips, some with captions like “Türk Amatör Kız #14”.
  • Advertising VIP access: posts with screenshots of private channel galleries and invite links, promising an archive of tens of thousands of videos and photos.
  • Admin contacts: posts inviting people to write in DM about shows and subscriptions.

Publications come out almost every day, mostly during the day on weekdays; there are no forwards from other channels in the sample. The feed is short and visual, with regular ad inserts about paid access.

By subscribers, it ranks #15 of 18 channels in the NSFW 18+ niche of the catalog.

What to pay attention to

Views exceed subscribers: ERR ≈ 315%

Median views are noticeably higher than the subscriber count — across half of the posts, not just one viral one. This happens when posts spread beyond the channel through reposts, chats, or external traffic, but the other metrics do not support this version.

What grade F means

The index is at its lowest: the metrics fall far outside usual values, or Telegram has flagged the channel as a scam. See the “How the assessment was produced” section for details.

Channel content

⚠️ Mixed content signals

Most posts are ads for its own private VIP channels with invite links and promises of a huge archive (“+220 000 videos,” “100% satisfaction”); there are calls like “don’t miss it” — signs of a bait format.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 9 NSFW 18+ catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 181 to 60,281 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 8 of 9
@turkamatorturbanlivip 315.3%
similar channels median 28%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 9 of 9
@turkamatorturbanlivip 0.05
similar channels median 0.48

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Scroll horizontally to see the full charts.

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 2 to Oct 19. The dashed line is the median (4,979).

06.7K13KSep 2: 3,581 viewsSep 2: 3,488 viewsSep 2: 3,565 viewsSep 2: 3,580 viewsSep 2: 3,783 viewsSep 2: 3,802 viewsSep 2: 3,668 viewsSep 2: 3,746 viewsSep 2: 4,450 viewsSep 2: 4,210 viewsSep 2: 4,385 viewsSep 2: 3,857 viewsSep 2: 4,753 viewsSep 2: 5,082 viewsSep 2: 4,877 viewsSep 2: 6,186 viewsSep 2: 5,519 viewsSep 2: 5,394 viewsSep 2: 5,188 viewsSep 2: 6,042 viewsSep 2: 6,128 viewsSep 2: 6,508 viewsSep 2: 6,666 viewsSep 2: 8,111 viewsSep 2: 7,782 viewsSep 2: 7,483 viewsSep 2: 7,234 viewsSep 2: 7,073 viewsSep 2: 6,818 viewsSep 2: 8,688 viewsSep 2: 12,205 viewsSep 2: 10,892 viewsSep 5: 13,377 viewsOct 5: 7,463 viewsOct 19: 538 viewsOct 19: 526 viewsOct 19: 584 viewsOct 19: 577 viewsOct 19: 580 viewsOct 19: 426 views Sep 2Oct 19
  • post views
  • 6 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 4,979

Maximum: 13,377 views. Data as of Oct 20.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Views exceed subscribers: ERR ≈ 315%

Median views are noticeably higher than the subscriber count — across half of the posts, not just one viral one. This happens when posts spread beyond the channel through reposts, chats, or external traffic, but the other metrics do not support this version.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel's data has been collected once — the chart will appear after the next update.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Some of the channel's metrics deviate, so it is hard to say in advance how many people will see an ad.

Not calculated: many of the channel's metrics deviate, so a forecast would be unreliable.

Reach of advertising posts

Advertising posts have a median of 6,508 views versus 5,394 for regular posts — 21% higher.

Based on 5 advertising and 29 regular posts older than two days.

Without an ad label: 4 posts.

Questions about @turkamatorturbanlivip

Is the channel clean?

The purity index is 25 out of 100, grade F, level “many deviations.” There are discrepancies in the metrics: there are more views than subscribers, while there are almost no reactions, and some message IDs have been deleted.

Do many people see a post?

The median views are about 4979 with 1579 subscribers, meaning there are more views than the channel’s base. Where these views come from is not visible from the audit data.

Is it worth advertising here?

The advisability of placement is marked as questionable: the purity index is low, the channel has deviations in its metrics, so it is hard to say in advance how many people will see the ad.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-20
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @turkamatorturbanlivip assessment dated 2026-10-20 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 1,579 subscribers, median post views were 4,979, ERR was 315.3%, and the cleanliness index was 25/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/obsessed_with_ai.