Fake engagement check for @sukati_dadaidinaxyi

SUKA SEEEX — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-10.

70 /100

Grade B low manipulation risk cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-10

Subscribers: 46
Median views: 25
ERR: 54.3%
Posts sampled: 40

Assessment summary

A low risk score with abnormally uniform views (CV 0.12) is explained by the channel's micro-size: with 46 subscribers, the median of 25 views is consistently generated by the author and a close circle of acquaintances, rather than a bot farm. However, a posting frequency of around 80 messages per day turns the feed into a continuous conveyor, where an ad will instantly get lost and won't even have time to gain current reach.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 5 checked Video Games channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 75 to 131 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 3 of 5

54.3% for @sukati_dadaidinaxyi similar channels median: 58%

Reactions per 100 views higher than 3 of 5

5.88 for @sukati_dadaidinaxyi similar channels median: 3.7

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source: Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot: 2026-09-10
Sample: The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method: TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result: The @sukati_dadaidinaxyi assessment dated 2026-09-10 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 46 subscribers, median post views were 25, ERR was 54.3%, and the cleanliness index was 70/100.
Limitations: This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

So many posts that an ad quickly slides down the feed.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

What grade B means

Mostly clean with a couple of weak signals. Check again before a big ad purchase.

What to pay attention to

Suspiciously uniform views (CV ≈ 0.12)

The variance of views across posts is noticeably below the norm for an organic channel (usually 0.15–0.6). Partial view boosting is possible.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 10 to Sep 10. The dashed line is the median (25).

post views
40 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
median 25

Maximum: 29 views. Data as of Sep 10.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Suspiciously uniform views (CV ≈ 0.12)

The variance of views across posts is noticeably below the norm for an organic channel (usually 0.15–0.6). Partial view boosting is possible.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

Check today: @sukati_dadaidinaxyi

Data from 2026-09-10 — 10 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @sukati_dadaidinaxyi and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @sukati_dadaidinaxyi

Questions about @sukati_dadaidinaxyi

Is the channel safe from the standpoint of artificial boosting?

The channel has a low risk score of 30 out of 100; however, due to the base size of 46 subscribers, the deterministic check confidence is marked as low.

Why was an abnormally low variance in views recorded?

The coefficient of variation of 0.12 is due to the fact that with a median of 25 views, the content is consistently viewed by the same small group of real users.

Why is ad placement considered questionable?

The reason for the verdict is the publishing volume of up to 80 posts per day, which causes any commercial post to quickly sink down the feed.