PR в @cparu | @araycpa | @cpapoint CMO в @adcombo_cpa Однажды нанетворкала, а не насосала и теперь приходится работать Мой Telegram — @rusakovaksenia
checked 2026-09-09
- Subscribers
- 1,806
- Median views
- 398
- ERR
- 22.0%
- Posts sampled
- 40
Assessment summary
The low risk is driven by natural view dynamics and a pattern typical of an author's microblog, where a narrow circle of commenters reflects the core of regular readers and acquaintances of the author. With a median of about 400 views, an advertiser gains exposure to an engaged specialized audience in the CPA and marketing niche. However, with a frequency of more than 5 posts per day, an ad post gets pushed down the feed quite quickly, which shortens the period of active view accumulation.
Compared with similar channels
Compared with 7 checked Blogs channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 639 to 3,040 subscribers.
This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-09-09
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @rusakova_top assessment dated 2026-09-09 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 1,806 subscribers, median post views were 398, ERR was 22.0%, and the cleanliness index was 96/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: reasonable.
About 213–298 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.
Reach of advertising posts
Too few advertising posts to compare: 1.
What grade A+ means
Almost no signs of manipulation: reactions look real and reach matches the subscriber count. The safest place for ads.
What to pay attention to
Comments are written by a narrow circle of accounts (18 out of 60)
The share of unique authors among comments is low — the discussion is maintained by a small group of accounts. This could be an active core, but it is worth checking if it is artificial inflation.
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 2 to Sep 9. The dashed line is the median (398).
- post views
- 7 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
- median 398
Maximum: 540 views. Data as of Sep 9.
No deviations found in views. Manipulation doesn't always show up in views, so look at the whole index.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.
Forwarding links
@rusakova_top forwards posts from
- @broconf check in the botcheck
@rusakova_top's posts are forwarded by
Only among channels we have checked.
Data from 2026-09-09 — 11 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.
Buy advertising
No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.
We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.
Monitor this channel
The bot will recheck @rusakova_top and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.
Monitor @rusakova_topQuestions about @rusakova_top
Is it safe to place ads on this channel?
Yes, the deterministic check showed minimal risk (score 4/100). Engagement and view metrics are typical of an organic author's blog.
What reach can be expected from a post?
The median reach of a single post is about 400 views (ERR around 22%). The audience actively responds to the author's posts, and the advertising load on the channel is minimal — about 2%.
Is placing an ad justified?
Placement is considered justified. The channel is suitable for native advertising and services tailored to the author's target audience, although the fast pace of new posts should be taken into account.
Similar channels in Blogs
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
Other checked channels
- 97 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 70 · B
- 98 · A+
- 70 · B
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 90 · A
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.