TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @Rpsc2ndgradenotes

Fake engagement check for @Rpsc2ndgradenotes

Rpsc 2nd Grade Notes™ — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-07.

𝗔𝗱𝗺𝗶𝗻 ~ @Aspirant_robot Buy ads: https://telega.io/c/Rpsc2ndgradenotes 2nd Grade Exams || 1st Grade Exams PYQ Test Series ||

Grade D some signals require caution cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-07
Subscribers
90,153
Median views
9,847
ERR
10.9%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Education

Assessment summary

With a frequency of more than 10 publications per day, an advertisement rapidly moves down the feed, limiting the time of direct contact with the audience to a few hours. The presence of about 45% deleted publications makes it impossible to assess post retention stability and the actual performance of past integrations. In addition, weak engagement (0.14% reactions to views) is typical for channels with utilitarian educational content, where readers view exam materials but rarely respond to third-party offers.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 6 checked Education channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 40,688 to 138,553 subscribers.

ERR (reach) at the median
10.9% for @Rpsc2ndgradenotes similar channels median: 11.2%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 5 of 5
0.14 for @Rpsc2ndgradenotes similar channels median: 0.32

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-07
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @Rpsc2ndgradenotes assessment dated 2026-09-07 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 90,153 subscribers, median post views were 9,847, ERR was 10.9%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

So many posts that an ad quickly slides down the feed.

About 6,108–10,179 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

What grade D means

Clear signs of manipulation: several strong signals at once. Ads here are risky.

What to pay attention to

It looks like some posts have been deleted (≈45% gaps in numbering)

There are many gaps in the numbering of recent publications — some posts have been deleted. This is often how completed ad placements are hidden to conceal their actual reach. By itself, this indicator is indirect (posts are also deleted during edits).

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 3 to Sep 7. The dashed line is the median (9,847).

06.1K12KSep 3: 12,257 viewsSep 3: 10,903 viewsSep 3: 11,723 viewsSep 4: 10,742 viewsSep 4: 9,747 viewsSep 4: 8,882 viewsSep 4: 8,961 viewsSep 4: 10,473 viewsSep 4: 10,144 viewsSep 4: 11,016 viewsSep 4: 10,573 viewsSep 4: 9,574 viewsSep 4: 10,235 viewsSep 4: 9,630 viewsSep 4: 9,002 viewsSep 5: 8,109 viewsSep 5: 8,113 viewsSep 5: 9,298 viewsSep 5: 11,187 viewsSep 5: 9,953 viewsSep 5: 10,556 viewsSep 5: 10,525 viewsSep 5: 10,261 viewsSep 5: 11,463 viewsSep 5: 11,102 viewsSep 5: 9,947 viewsSep 5: 10,243 viewsSep 5: 10,527 viewsSep 6: 9,986 viewsSep 6: 9,033 viewsSep 6: 9,278 viewsSep 6: 9,068 viewsSep 6: 5,724 viewsSep 6: 6,099 viewsSep 6: 6,433 viewsSep 6: 5,985 viewsSep 6: 6,133 viewsSep 6: 6,236 viewsSep 7: 4,111 viewsSep 7: 3,009 views Sep 3Sep 7

Maximum: 12,257 views. Data as of Sep 7.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

Check today: @Rpsc2ndgradenotes

Data from 2026-09-07 — 13 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @Rpsc2ndgradenotes and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @Rpsc2ndgradenotes

Questions about @Rpsc2ndgradenotes

What artificial inflation risk level is determined for this channel?

The channel is in the yellow zone with a risk score of 50 out of 100 (medium risk). The deletion of about 45% of recent messages and an atypically low share of reader reactions cause concern.

What reach does a publication get on the channel?

The median reach is around 9.8K views (ERR around 10.9%). However, the audience consumes content passively: only 0.14% of those who saw the post leave reactions.

Is it advisable to buy ads in this channel?

The placement is considered questionable due to the conveyor-belt feed effect: with more than 10 publications regularly released per day, the advertisement is quickly displaced by new content.

Similar channels in Education

All channels in Education

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.

Check @Rpsc2ndgradenotes