TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @rezedakashpo

Fake engagement check for @rezedakashpo

Кашпо от Резеды — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-19.

Grade D some signals require caution cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-19
Subscribers
2,805
Median views
675
ERR
24.1%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Home & Architecture
Post language Russian
Channel age 11 months

Assessment summary

Nearly half of the posts in the feed have been deleted (47%), and audience engagement in reactions is abnormally low — only 0.3% of views. Combined with the fact that the channel operates exclusively as a showcase for designer planters and has never published third-party ads, there is a tangible risk of paying for artificially inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-19
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @rezedakashpo assessment dated 2026-09-19 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 2,805 subscribers, median post views were 675, ERR was 24.1%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Some of the views may be fake.

About 338 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

What grade D means

Clear signs of manipulation: several strong signals at once. Ads here are risky.

What to pay attention to

It seems some posts were deleted (≈47% gaps in numbering)

There are many gaps in the numbering of recent publications — some posts have been deleted. This is often done to hide completed ad campaigns and conceal their actual reach. This indicator alone is indirect (posts are also deleted when editing).

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 9 to Sep 19. The dashed line is the median (675).

06311.3KSep 9: 1,051 viewsSep 9: 1,016 viewsSep 10: 871 viewsSep 10: 838 viewsSep 10: 741 viewsSep 10: 622 viewsSep 10: 644 viewsSep 10: 604 viewsSep 10: 594 viewsSep 10: 596 viewsSep 10: 595 viewsSep 10: 592 viewsSep 10: 586 viewsSep 10: 596 viewsSep 10: 609 viewsSep 10: 615 viewsSep 10: 628 viewsSep 10: 633 viewsSep 10: 638 viewsSep 10: 662 viewsSep 10: 667 viewsSep 10: 683 viewsSep 10: 753 viewsSep 10: 777 viewsSep 10: 860 viewsSep 10: 777 viewsSep 10: 751 viewsSep 10: 814 viewsSep 10: 809 viewsSep 10: 877 viewsSep 10: 922 viewsSep 10: 998 viewsSep 10: 1,164 viewsSep 10: 1,263 viewsSep 14: 1,150 viewsSep 14: 1,149 viewsSep 17: 543 viewsSep 19: 269 viewsSep 19: 269 viewsSep 19: 122 views Sep 9Sep 19

Maximum: 1,263 views. Data as of Sep 19.

No deviations found in views. Manipulation doesn't always show up in views, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

Run a fresh check for @rezedakashpo

Data from 2026-09-19 — fresh.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @rezedakashpo and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @rezedakashpo

Questions about @rezedakashpo

Is it safe to buy ads on this channel?

Buying ads is considered questionable: the risk score is 50 out of 100. The channel has a recorded 47% deletion of posts and suspicion of artificially inflated views.

What is the actual reach of the publications?

The median stands at 675 views (ERR around 24%), but only a tiny fraction of a percent of readers leaves reactions. This is a typical sign that some views may be inflated.

Is this channel suitable for business promotion?

Effectiveness is questionable, as the author runs a personal planter shop and has not posted third-party ads before. In such a narrow showcase, a commercial ad can easily end up without targeted clicks.

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.

Check @rezedakashpo