checked 2026-09-19
- Subscribers
- 2,805
- Median views
- 675
- ERR
- 24.1%
- Posts sampled
- 40
Assessment summary
Nearly half of the posts in the feed have been deleted (47%), and audience engagement in reactions is abnormally low — only 0.3% of views. Combined with the fact that the channel operates exclusively as a showcase for designer planters and has never published third-party ads, there is a tangible risk of paying for artificially inflated views.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-09-19
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @rezedakashpo assessment dated 2026-09-19 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 2,805 subscribers, median post views were 675, ERR was 24.1%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: questionable.
Some of the views may be fake.
About 338 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.
Reach of advertising posts
No advertising posts among the latest 40.
What grade D means
Clear signs of manipulation: several strong signals at once. Ads here are risky.
What to pay attention to
It seems some posts were deleted (≈47% gaps in numbering)
There are many gaps in the numbering of recent publications — some posts have been deleted. This is often done to hide completed ad campaigns and conceal their actual reach. This indicator alone is indirect (posts are also deleted when editing).
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 9 to Sep 19. The dashed line is the median (675).
- post views
- 3 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
- median 675
Maximum: 1,263 views. Data as of Sep 19.
No deviations found in views. Manipulation doesn't always show up in views, so look at the whole index.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.
Data from 2026-09-19 — fresh.
Buy advertising
No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.
We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.
Monitor this channel
The bot will recheck @rezedakashpo and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.
Monitor @rezedakashpoQuestions about @rezedakashpo
Is it safe to buy ads on this channel?
Buying ads is considered questionable: the risk score is 50 out of 100. The channel has a recorded 47% deletion of posts and suspicion of artificially inflated views.
What is the actual reach of the publications?
The median stands at 675 views (ERR around 24%), but only a tiny fraction of a percent of readers leaves reactions. This is a typical sign that some views may be inflated.
Is this channel suitable for business promotion?
Effectiveness is questionable, as the author runs a personal planter shop and has not posted third-party ads before. In such a narrow showcase, a commercial ad can easily end up without targeted clicks.
Other checked channels
- 97 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 70 · B
- 98 · A+
- 70 · B
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 90 · A
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.