TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @razvivaemrf

Fake engagement check for @razvivaemrf

Источник в ВЭБе — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-09.

Официальный канал ВЭБ.РФ. Мы финансируем проекты, меняющие жизнь в городах к лучшему: строим дороги, школы, модернизируем транспорт, создаем предприятия. ▪️ вэб.рф ▪️ ok.ru/vebrf ▪️ max.ru/vebrf ▪️ vk.com/vebrf ▪️ dzen.ru/vebrf

Grade A low manipulation risk cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-09
Subscribers
33,784
Median views
1,476
ERR
4.4%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Investments

Assessment summary

The official status of a development institution and verification confirm the organic nature of the channel with no signs of fake engagement. However, advertising placement is questionable due to low reach: with a base of over 33 thousand subscribers, a post is read on average by only about 1.5 thousand people, and closed comments limit engagement with the audience. In addition, with an intensity of more than 6 posts per day, a commercial post is quickly displaced from focus by corporate news.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 5 checked Investments channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 14,338 to 18,968 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 5 of 5
4.4% for @razvivaemrf similar channels median: 23.3%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 3 of 5
1.41 for @razvivaemrf similar channels median: 1.5

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-09
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @razvivaemrf assessment dated 2026-09-09 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 33,784 subscribers, median post views were 1,476, ERR was 4.4%, and the cleanliness index was 85/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

About 739–1,436 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

What grade A means

Looks clean: metrics are normal, no manipulation visible.

What to pay attention to

Channel is verified by Telegram

The channel has an official Telegram verification badge — a weak positive trust signal (it does not directly affect the fake engagement risk score).

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 3 to Sep 9. The dashed line is the median (1,476).

053K107KSep 3: 1,418 viewsSep 3: 1,209 viewsSep 3: 1,559 viewsSep 3: 1,435 viewsSep 3: 1,965 viewsSep 3: 2,018 viewsSep 3: 2,034 viewsSep 3: 2,484 viewsSep 3: 1,589 viewsSep 3: 1,795 viewsSep 3: 1,597 viewsSep 3: 49,458 viewsSep 3: 106,763 viewsSep 3: 32,581 viewsSep 3: 1,245 viewsSep 3: 1,445 viewsSep 4: 1,497 viewsSep 4: 1,373 viewsSep 4: 1,640 viewsSep 4: 3,684 viewsSep 4: 3,983 viewsSep 4: 1,998 viewsSep 4: 1,859 viewsSep 4: 2,358 viewsSep 5: 1,997 viewsSep 7: 1,125 viewsSep 7: 1,122 viewsSep 7: 1,456 viewsSep 9: 724 viewsSep 9: 1,011 viewsSep 9: 1,437 viewsSep 9: 1,436 viewsSep 9: 1,436 viewsSep 9: 1,436 viewsSep 9: 1,434 viewsSep 9: 1,861 viewsSep 9: 818 viewsSep 9: 461 viewsSep 9: 308 viewsSep 9: 565 views Sep 3Sep 9

Maximum: 106,763 views. Data as of Sep 9.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

@razvivaemrf's posts are forwarded by

Only among channels we have checked.

Map of all links between checked channels

Check today: @razvivaemrf

Data from 2026-09-09 — 11 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @razvivaemrf and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @razvivaemrf

Questions about @razvivaemrf

Are subscribers or views on the channel artificially inflated?

No, the channel has official verification and a minimal risk score of 15 out of 100, indicating an organic audience with no signs of bots.

Why is advertising placement considered questionable?

The reason is reach: posts are viewed by only a small fraction of subscribers (ERR around 4.37%, median 1,476 views per 33.7K subscribers), and comments are disabled.

What result will a publication in this channel deliver?

You should expect a baseline reach of around 1.5 thousand views; however, due to posting more than 6 posts per day, promotional material will quickly be pushed down the feed.

Similar channels in Investments

All channels in Investments

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.

Check @razvivaemrf