TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @qwerrty_7

Fake engagement check for @qwerrty_7

канал qwerty — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-15.

Grade A low manipulation risk cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-15
Subscribers
6,456
Median views
2,619
ERR
40.6%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Blogs
Post language Russian
Channel age 4 years

Assessment summary

A personal blog with a clean history and zero ad clutter, where the audience actively engages with content. The wide variance in views and a quarter of deleted posts are typical for creator channels where the admin cleans up the feed from temporary stories and video messages; therefore, with a median of 2.6 thousand views, an ad will capture the attention of engaged subscribers.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 9 checked Blogs channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 2,324 to 14,170 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 7 of 9
40.6% for @qwerrty_7 similar channels median: 23.8%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 9 of 9
39.56 for @qwerrty_7 similar channels median: 2.09

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-15
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @qwerrty_7 assessment dated 2026-09-15 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 6,456 subscribers, median post views were 2,619, ERR was 40.6%, and the cleanliness index was 85/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

About 3,660–3,929 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

What grade A means

Looks clean: metrics are normal, no manipulation visible.

What to pay attention to

Older posts gathered fewer views than recent ones (×0.55)

Views on older posts are lower than 24-hour views, which is atypical for organic post maturation. This may indicate view boosting on recent publications or sharp traffic fluctuations. Caveat: there are only 2 daily posts in the sample, which is not enough to reliably assess the channel; this observation is treated as a weak signal.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Jul 24 to Sep 15. The dashed line is the median (2,619).

069K137KJul 24: 636 viewsJul 24: 657 viewsJul 24: 641 viewsJul 24: 1,582 viewsJul 24: 672 viewsJul 24: 2,916 viewsJul 26: 3,878 viewsJul 26: 634 viewsJul 26: 670 viewsJul 26: 5,317 viewsJul 26: 1,595 viewsJul 27: 137,320 viewsJul 31: 10,518 viewsAug 1: 4,050 viewsAug 3: 3,792 viewsAug 3: 2,525 viewsAug 4: 3,124 viewsAug 4: 3,519 viewsAug 4: 1,124 viewsAug 9: 3,819 viewsAug 14: 3,764 viewsAug 14: 2,594 viewsAug 14: 647 viewsAug 14: 917 viewsAug 14: 766 viewsAug 16: 4,290 viewsAug 18: 3,582 viewsAug 20: 3,985 viewsAug 20: 671 viewsAug 20: 672 viewsAug 20: 2,800 viewsAug 20: 656 viewsAug 20: 657 viewsAug 20: 639 viewsAug 20: 3,434 viewsAug 23: 2,322 viewsSep 3: 6,819 viewsSep 3: 2,757 viewsSep 15: 6,703 viewsSep 15: 2,645 views Jul 24Sep 15

Maximum: 137,320 views. Data as of Sep 15.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Older posts gathered fewer views than recent ones (×0.55)

Views on older posts are lower than 24-hour views, which is atypical for organic post maturation. This may indicate view boosting on recent publications or sharp traffic fluctuations. Caveat: there are only 2 daily posts in the sample, which is not enough to reliably assess the channel; this observation is treated as a weak signal.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

@qwerrty_7 forwards posts from

Map of all links between checked channels

Check today: @qwerrty_7

Data from 2026-09-15 — 5 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @qwerrty_7 and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @qwerrty_7

Questions about @qwerrty_7

Is this channel safe for advertising?

Yes, the analysis showed a minimal risk of manipulation/boosting (15 out of 100). The channel has no intrusive ads or signs of bots, making ad placement justified.

How many views will an ad post get?

A publication can expect around 2,600 views. With infrequent posting, the ad will not get lost in a stream of messages within a few hours.

Why does the statistics show a high share of deleted posts?

About 27% of publications are deleted by the admin, which in personal blogs is usually related to clearing out temporary stories or video messages. It is worth agreeing in advance on how long the ad must remain in the feed.

Similar channels in Blogs

All channels in Blogs

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.

Check @qwerrty_7