TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @pokupkii_na_wb

@pokupkii_na_wb: statistics and cleanliness index

Покупки на Wildberries

Приветствую Вас на канале «Покупки на Wildberries» Буду делиться с Вами интересными находками-покупками и ссылками на них. Для связи @irusiairovna

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-08
Subscribers
3,884
Median views
5,574
ERR
143.5%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Offers & Promotions

Data from 2026-09-08 — 30 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel is free of signs of manipulation (risk score 0), but placing ads is questionable due to a prolonged period of inactivity: there have been no publications for 196 days. The abnormally high ERR (over 140%) is explained by the accumulation of views on old posts over months of inactivity.

If posting resumes, the actual reach of a fresh advertising post will be significantly lower than the median of 5.5 thousand views due to the inevitable churn of audience attention.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 10 Offers & Promotions catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 1,296 to 10,351 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 10 of 10
@pokupkii_na_wb 143.5%
similar channels median 23.1%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 7 of 9
@pokupkii_na_wb 1.14
similar channels median 0.52

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Dec 10 to Feb 24. The dashed line is the median (5,574).

04.4K8.8KDec 10: 5,529 viewsDec 10: 6,275 viewsDec 10: 7,268 viewsDec 10: 8,078 viewsDec 10: 7,546 viewsDec 10: 8,844 viewsDec 16: 7,886 viewsDec 21: 5,012 viewsDec 21: 6,568 viewsDec 21: 5,752 viewsDec 22: 5,292 viewsDec 22: 6,523 viewsDec 22: 8,229 viewsDec 26: 6,938 viewsDec 27: 7,000 viewsJan 9: 4,051 viewsJan 9: 4,746 viewsJan 9: 4,776 viewsJan 9: 5,246 viewsJan 9: 5,739 viewsJan 9: 6,888 viewsJan 14: 4,551 viewsJan 14: 4,040 viewsJan 14: 4,227 viewsJan 14: 4,203 viewsJan 14: 5,620 viewsJan 14: 5,717 viewsJan 14: 5,100 viewsJan 15: 5,309 viewsJan 15: 5,221 viewsJan 15: 6,121 viewsJan 15: 8,433 viewsFeb 5: 4,400 viewsFeb 5: 3,673 viewsFeb 5: 3,896 viewsFeb 5: 5,486 viewsFeb 5: 6,798 viewsFeb 5: 7,304 viewsFeb 16: 5,247 viewsFeb 24: 3,261 views Dec 10Feb 24
  • post views
  • median 5,574

Maximum: 8,844 views. Data as of Sep 8.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 26: index 100, grade A+Jun 26Sep 8: index 100, grade A+Sep 8

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

The channel has gone quiet — ask the owner when the next post is due.

No new posts for over two weeks, so ad reach can't be forecast right now.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @pokupkii_na_wb

Are there signs of subscriber or view manipulation on the channel?

Technical analysis revealed no traces of bots or manipulation: the risk score is 0 out of 100, comments on posts are enabled, and organic reactions are present.

Why is the feasibility of placing ads marked as questionable?

The channel has been inactive for more than six months (the last post was published 196 days ago), so audience activity has declined and buying ads is not feasible.

What reach can be expected in this channel?

The historical median is 5,574 views per post; however, these figures were formed by archived publications, and one should not expect the same performance from new ads in an abandoned channel.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-08
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @pokupkii_na_wb assessment dated 2026-09-08 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 3,884 subscribers, median post views were 5,574, ERR was 143.5%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.