TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @nedyrov

Fake engagement check for @nedyrov

Boring channel Nedyrov — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-19.

Lifehacks about AI automation

Grade D some signals require caution cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-19
Subscribers
2,126
Median views
3,592
ERR
169.0%
Posts sampled
39
Niche Computer science
Post language Russian
Channel age 2 years

Assessment summary

With an audience of 2.1 thousand subscribers, posts consistently gain over 3.5 thousand views without relying on viral reposts. An extremely low reaction rate (0.2% of views) reinforces the suspicion that reach is inflated by bots or driven by external clickbait. Due to the risk of artificial views, the actual return on advertising here is unpredictable.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 11 checked Computer science channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 1,655 to 5,962 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 11 of 11
169% for @nedyrov similar channels median: 24.1%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 10 of 10
0.2 for @nedyrov similar channels median: 0.65

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-19
Sample
The latest 39 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @nedyrov assessment dated 2026-09-19 uses 39 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 2,126 subscribers, median post views were 3,592, ERR was 169.0%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Some of the views may be fake.

About 1,425–2,850 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Advertising posts have a median of 3,064 views versus 3,862 for regular posts — 21% lower.

Based on 4 advertising and 34 regular posts older than two days.

Without an ad label: 2 posts.

What grade D means

Clear signs of manipulation: several strong signals at once. Ads here are risky.

What to pay attention to

Views exceed what is reasonable for the subscriber base: ERR ≈ 169%

Median views significantly exceed the subscriber count (this is the median across half of the posts, not just a single viral post). Without massive reposts, this indicates likely view inflation or clickbait traffic.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 39 posts with views, from Aug 8 to Sep 18. The dashed line is the median (3,592).

04.2K8.3KAug 8: 1,243 viewsAug 8: 1,361 viewsAug 8: 1,291 viewsAug 8: 1,601 viewsAug 8: 1,716 viewsAug 9: 1,767 viewsAug 9: 2,042 viewsAug 10: 2,536 viewsAug 10: 2,453 viewsAug 11: 2,324 viewsAug 11: 2,309 viewsAug 12: 2,717 viewsAug 13: 2,740 viewsAug 16: 3,834 viewsAug 17: 3,592 viewsAug 20: 3,545 viewsAug 20: 3,009 viewsAug 20: 3,890 viewsAug 20: 4,297 viewsAug 21: 5,997 viewsAug 21: 5,040 viewsAug 21: 6,612 viewsAug 24: 5,755 viewsAug 24: 7,969 viewsAug 25: 8,319 viewsAug 29: 6,369 viewsAug 31: 5,801 viewsSep 1: 6,338 viewsSep 3: 4,941 viewsSep 5: 4,480 viewsSep 5: 5,002 viewsSep 7: 6,519 viewsSep 8: 5,632 viewsSep 8: 6,466 viewsSep 9: 6,448 viewsSep 14: 2,801 viewsSep 14: 2,832 viewsSep 14: 2,834 viewsSep 18: 682 views Aug 8Sep 18

Maximum: 8,319 views. Data as of Sep 19.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Views exceed what is reasonable for the subscriber base: ERR ≈ 169%

Median views significantly exceed the subscriber count (this is the median across half of the posts, not just a single viral post). Without massive reposts, this indicates likely view inflation or clickbait traffic.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

@nedyrov forwards posts from

Map of all links between checked channels

Run a fresh check for @nedyrov

Data from 2026-09-19 — fresh.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @nedyrov and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @nedyrov

Questions about @nedyrov

What is the risk of manipulation for this channel?

The channel received a moderate risk score of 50 out of 100. The primary anomaly is that views regularly exceed the entire subscriber base by more than 1.5 times.

How many real views does an ad get?

The median reach of an ad post is about 3,064 views, which is 21% lower than regular publications. At the same time, engagement is weak: only a tenth of a percent of readers leave reactions.

Is it worth buying ads on this channel?

Placement is considered questionable due to the likelihood that views are inflated. High counter metrics may not translate into real conversions and clients.

Similar channels in Computer science

All channels in Computer science

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.

Check @nedyrov