TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @mxxzovo

@mxxzovo: statistics and cleanliness index

明星写真 偶像画册

内容来自互联网，仅供学习、交流或非商业用途。如有侵权，请联系我们，我们将及时处理。 Some content is sourced from the internet and is for learning, communication, or non-commercial purposes only. If any infringement is identified, please contact us, and we will address it promptly.

Share this report
Telegram

Grade C some metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-15
Subscribers
358
Median views
13
ERR
3.6%
Posts sampled
40
Niche NSFW 18+
Post language Chinese 92% of posts
Channel age 1 year

Data from 2026-10-15 — fresh.

Assessment summary

An archive of photo albums and erotic shoots of Chinese and Japanese models and actresses in Chinese, maintained for a year and a half. Views are almost identical across all posts, and there are no reactions at all (0% of views).

Due to audience passivity and a stream of 178 posts per day, a sponsored post will quickly get pushed up the feed without noticeable reader response.

About the channel

A channel featuring pictures from magazine and auteur adult photo albums dedicated to Asian actresses and models. The feed has been maintained in Chinese for 19 months: 98% of posts are photos with short captions or biographical notes about the artists.

In the catalog, the channel is listed next to @tthentai1 and @yunduancloud. @mxxzovo has 358 subscribers—it is noticeably smaller than @tthentai1 (8,867 subscribers), but larger than @yunduancloud (154 subscribers). At the same time, a smaller share of subscribers sees a post here (3.6%) compared to @tthentai1 (27.9%) and @yunduancloud (96.1%).

What is published:

  • Japanese photo albums: archival and modern shoots of singers, actresses, and models tagged #日本, ranging from 1980s–1990s releases (Noriko Sakai, Izumi Sakai) to digital editions.
  • Chinese and Taiwanese photo albums: photo series of actresses and singers tagged #中国, often accompanied by a brief career and filmography summary (Tian Xin, Irene Wan, Shu Qi).

All publications come out on weekdays: 85% of posts are published during the day (12:00–18:00 UTC), and the remaining 15% in the evening (18:00–24:00 UTC). There are no forwards from other channels or third-party ads in the sample. Readers can expect a dense stream of archival photos (about 178 posts per day) with brief notes in Chinese and no ads.

By subscribers, it ranks #9 of 9 channels in the NSFW 18+ niche of the catalog.

What to pay attention to

Views without engagement (reactions ≈ 0.000% of views)

There are views, but almost no reactions. Usually, with this level of reach, at least someone reacts to the posts.

What grade C means

Some metrics fall outside usual values — for example reach, view spread or reactions. The “How the assessment was produced” section shows which ones.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 6 NSFW 18+ catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 2,618 to 60,281 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 6 of 6
@mxxzovo 3.6%
similar channels median 27.8%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 6 of 6
@mxxzovo 0
similar channels median 0.6

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Oct 14 to Oct 14. The dashed line is the median (13).

0918Oct 14: 14 viewsOct 14: 12 viewsOct 14: 13 viewsOct 14: 11 viewsOct 14: 12 viewsOct 14: 11 viewsOct 14: 11 viewsOct 14: 10 viewsOct 14: 10 viewsOct 14: 12 viewsOct 14: 14 viewsOct 14: 14 viewsOct 14: 14 viewsOct 14: 13 viewsOct 14: 14 viewsOct 14: 15 viewsOct 14: 17 viewsOct 14: 16 viewsOct 14: 15 viewsOct 14: 14 viewsOct 14: 13 viewsOct 14: 15 viewsOct 14: 14 viewsOct 14: 13 viewsOct 14: 13 viewsOct 14: 14 viewsOct 14: 14 viewsOct 14: 15 viewsOct 14: 17 viewsOct 14: 10 viewsOct 14: 12 viewsOct 14: 11 viewsOct 14: 13 viewsOct 14: 12 viewsOct 14: 13 viewsOct 14: 13 viewsOct 14: 15 viewsOct 14: 15 viewsOct 14: 18 viewsOct 14: 18 views Oct 14Oct 14
  • post views
  • 40 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 13

Maximum: 18 views. Data as of Oct 15.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Views are more even than usual (CV ≈ 0.15)

The variance in views between posts is lower than usual for channels (0.15–0.6): posts gather almost the exact same number of views.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel's data has been collected once — the chart will appear after the next update.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

The audience barely reacts to posts.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Questions about @mxxzovo

What is the purity index of @mxxzovo?

The purity index is 55 out of 100 (grade C, "deviations present" level). The score is lowered because views are distributed more evenly than usual, and there are no reactions on posts (0%).

How many subscribers see the posts in the channel?

The median view count is 13 out of 358 subscribers, meaning a typical post is seen by about 3.63% of the base.

Is it worth advertising in @mxxzovo?

The advisability of ad placement is marked as questionable. The reason is audience passivity: despite having views, publications have almost no reactions, and comments are closed.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-15
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @mxxzovo assessment dated 2026-10-15 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 358 subscribers, median post views were 13, ERR was 3.6%, and the cleanliness index was 55/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.