Fake engagement check for @Minecraft_me_live

Rtytь_VOIT — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-17.

Причины подписаться на этот канал! 1. Выходит очень классные моды 2. Я начинающий Майнкрафт блогер 3. Я добрий:) Подпишитесь пожалуйста я хочу стать популярным🥺

100 /100

Grade A+ low manipulation risk cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-17

Subscribers: 167
Median views: 26
ERR: 15.6%
Posts sampled: 40

Niche Video Games

Post language Russian

Channel age 10 months

Assessment summary

The channel is a beginner personal Minecraft blog with no signs of inflation, but with a tiny audience: a post gathers an average of only 26 views. At a pace of around 8 posts per day, an ad message will drop out of sight in a matter of hours, so it makes sense to negotiate only for a long-term pin.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 8 checked Video Games channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 75 to 326 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 8 of 8

15.6% for @Minecraft_me_live similar channels median: 73.7%

Reactions per 100 views lower than 8 of 8

1.52 for @Minecraft_me_live similar channels median: 4.97

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source: Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot: 2026-09-17
Sample: The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method: TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result: The @Minecraft_me_live assessment dated 2026-09-17 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 167 subscribers, median post views were 26, ERR was 15.6%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.
Limitations: This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

What grade A+ means

Almost no signs of manipulation: reactions look real and reach matches the subscriber count. The safest place for ads.

What to pay attention to

Third-party spam in comments (not owner inflation)

The comments look like spam mailings and self-promotion from third-party accounts, rather than artificial engagement generated by the channel owner. This does not affect the inflation risk—it is only necessary to enable moderation/anti-spam in the comment chat.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 12 to Sep 17. The dashed line is the median (26).

post views
14 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
median 26

Maximum: 38 views. Data as of Sep 17.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

Check today: @Minecraft_me_live

Data from 2026-09-17 — 3 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @Minecraft_me_live and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @Minecraft_me_live

Questions about @Minecraft_me_live

Is there subscriber or view inflation on the channel?

No, the risk score is zero, and the view distribution looks natural for a small personal blog.

How many views will an advertisement get?

The median reach is 26 views per post with a total base of 167 subscribers.

Is placing an ad on this channel justified?

Formally, placement is justified due to clean statistics, but due to the very small audience, you should not expect a noticeable influx of traffic.