TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Channel unavailable Telegram can no longer find this channel: it was deleted or its address changed. The figures and score below are as of the last check, 2026-09-09.
Avatar of @keeelzy

@keeelzy: statistics and cleanliness index

kelzy

https://twitch.tv/kelzikk www.tiktok.com/@.keelzy cooperation @kelzyyx sewer

Share this report
Telegram

Grade D some metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-09
Subscribers
374
Median views
493
ERR
131.8%
Posts sampled
10
Niche Blogs

Data from 2026-09-09 — 29 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel is a streamer's personal microblog with extremely rare publications (averaging one post every ten days), where about 96% of previously published messages have been deleted. Views exceed the current subscriber count against the backdrop of a recent sharp outflow of 833 audience members, which is typical for channels with external viewer overflow from streams.

Placing ads here is questionable specifically due to the irregularity of posts and the unpredictability of the feed schedule.

What to pay attention to

Some messages were deleted: ≈96% of message numbers are missing

The numbering of the channel's recent messages has many gaps — some of them were deleted. Message numbers are counted, not posts: every photo in an album has its own number. Deleted posts are not visible, so the remaining ones give only a partial picture of the channel.

What grade D means

The index is clearly lowered: one or more metrics fall outside usual values. The “How the assessment was produced” section shows which ones.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 18 Blogs catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 137 to 1,106 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 15 of 18
@keeelzy 131.8%
similar channels median 69.8%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 15 of 18
@keeelzy 1.16
similar channels median 4.71

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 10 posts with views, from Jun 22 to Sep 9. The dashed line is the median (493).

0387774Jun 22: 774 viewsAug 14: 774 viewsAug 15: 641 viewsAug 17: 521 viewsAug 18: 562 viewsAug 19: 466 viewsAug 22: 427 viewsAug 28: 309 viewsSep 2: 211 viewsSep 9: 58 views Jun 22Sep 9
  • post views
  • 1 post newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 493

Maximum: 774 views. Data as of Sep 9.

No deviations in views. Views are only part of the metrics, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Aug 4: index 50, grade DAug 4Aug 4: index 50, grade DAug 4Sep 9: index 50, grade DSep 9

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Posts come out rarely, so an ad will struggle to get views.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 10.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @keeelzy

What is the risk of inflated metrics on the kelzy channel?

The risk score is in the yellow zone (50 out of 100) with low analysis confidence due to the small base size (374 subscribers). The main focus of attention is the loss of 833 subscribers in a month and the deletion of about 96% of past messages.

Why do post views exceed the number of subscribers?

A median of 493 views with 374 subscribers yields a reach of over 130%. For a streamer's resource, this is usually explained by direct link sharing to viewers from Twitch or TikTok platforms, rather than just metric manipulation.

Is buying ads on this platform justified?

The feasibility of placement is considered questionable. Posts appear extremely rarely (about 0.1 publications per day), and the audience is unstable, making it difficult to predict the timing and consistent effect of the integration.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-09
Sample
The latest 10 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @keeelzy assessment dated 2026-09-09 uses 10 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 374 subscribers, median post views were 493, ERR was 131.8%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.