TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @Fomota

Fake engagement check for @Fomota

FOMOTA — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-23.

Тот самый канал без инфоцыганства и около рыночников

Grade A low manipulation risk cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-23
Subscribers
16,000
Median views
767
ERR
4.8%
Posts sampled
13
Niche Cryptocurrencies
Post language Russian
Channel age less than a month

Assessment summary

The channel's audience is passive or burned out: with a base of 16 thousand subscribers, posts are read on average by only 767 people, and comments are closed. A high deletion rate (about 26%) combined with posting more than five times a day will cause an ad post to quickly get lost in the feed and receive minimal attention.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 15 checked Cryptocurrencies channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 5,531 to 36,820 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 13 of 15
4.8% for @Fomota similar channels median: 17.5%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 8 of 14
0.62 for @Fomota similar channels median: 0.73

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-23
Sample
The latest 13 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @Fomota assessment dated 2026-09-23 uses 13 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 16,000 subscribers, median post views were 767, ERR was 4.8%, and the cleanliness index was 85/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

About 695–1,071 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 1.

Without an ad label: 1 post.

What grade A means

Looks clean: metrics are normal, no manipulation visible.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 13 posts with views, from Sep 20 to Sep 22. The dashed line is the median (767).

08281.7KSep 20: 193 viewsSep 20: 204 viewsSep 20: 416 viewsSep 20: 487 viewsSep 20: 563 viewsSep 20: 767 viewsSep 20: 968 viewsSep 20: 1,508 viewsSep 20: 1,657 viewsSep 21: 1,136 viewsSep 21: 1,049 viewsSep 22: 885 viewsSep 22: 125 views Sep 20Sep 22

Maximum: 1,657 views. Data as of Sep 23.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

Run a fresh check for @Fomota

Data from 2026-09-23 — fresh.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @Fomota and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @Fomota

Questions about @Fomota

Are there signs of audience boosting on the channel?

There are no technical signs of boosting: the risk score is at a low level of 15 out of 100, and the view dynamics look natural.

Why is placing ads considered questionable?

The reason is weak reach: posts are viewed by only a small fraction of subscribers, and the median sits at 767 views.

How quickly will an ad post lose visibility in the feed?

The channel publishes more than 5 posts a day, so an ad post will quickly drop down the feed and collect views only in the first hours.

Similar channels in Cryptocurrencies

All channels in Cryptocurrencies

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.

Check @Fomota