Fake engagement check for @dangerlyoha

ДенжерЛьоха 🐷 — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-07.

меня звати Льоха мені 23 роки

50 /100

Grade D some signals require caution cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-07

Subscribers: 333,909
Median views: 389,503
ERR: 116.6%
Posts sampled: 40

Assessment summary

The deletion of around 60% of recent messages, combined with reach exceeding the subscriber base, raises doubts about the authenticity of the statistics and points to a possible cleanup of completed ads, making placement questionable. At the same time, the personal blog format of a gaming streamer and the channel's verification confirm the presence of an engaged core audience capable of generating organic external forwards from streams. For an advertiser, this creates unpredictability: the outcome of a post will depend directly on whether it catches a wave of viral attention or gets deleted by the admin shortly after.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 7 checked Video Games channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 116,938 to 738,346 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 7 of 7

116.6% for @dangerlyoha similar channels median: 18.8%

Reactions per 100 views higher than 5 of 6

5.49 for @dangerlyoha similar channels median: 1.4

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source: Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot: 2026-09-07
Sample: The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method: TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result: The @dangerlyoha assessment dated 2026-09-07 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 333,909 subscribers, median post views were 389,503, ERR was 116.6%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations: This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Some of the views may be fake.

About 194,752–389,503 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

What grade D means

Clear signs of manipulation: several strong signals at once. Ads here are risky.

What to pay attention to

Some posts appear to be deleted (≈60% gaps in numbering)

There are many gaps in the numbering of recent publications — some posts have been deleted. This is often done to hide completed ad placements and conceal their actual reach. This indicator alone is indirect (posts are also deleted when editing).

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Jul 3 to Sep 7. The dashed line is the median (389,503).

post views
1 post newer than one day and still gaining views
median 389,503

Maximum: 725,729 views. Data as of Sep 7.

What scoring found in the view pattern

High reach driven by external forwards: ERR ≈ 117%

Views exceed the subscriber base, but this looks organic rather than inflated: view counts vary noticeably from post to post, and reactions are genuine. Typical for content that is actively forwarded to external chats (work groups, aggregators) or goes viral outside the channel.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

Check today: @dangerlyoha

Data from 2026-09-07 — 13 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @dangerlyoha and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @dangerlyoha

Questions about @dangerlyoha

What risk level is assigned to this channel?

The channel has been assigned a medium risk level (50 out of 100). The main warning factors are the deletion of about 60% of recent posts and suspicion that the high views may be partially artificial.

Why do post views exceed the number of subscribers?

Median views stand at 389 thousand with 333 thousand subscribers (ERR of around 117%). For channels of popular streamers, such spikes are often caused by an influx of stream viewers and external forwards, but the system also flags this as potential artificial inflation.

Is it advisable to buy ads on this channel?

Placement is classified as questionable. Despite open comments, authentic reactions, and Telegram verification, regular post cleanup provides no guarantees of stable reach or long-term retention of the ad post in the feed.