TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Channel unavailable Telegram can no longer find this channel: it was deleted or its address changed. The figures and score below are as of the last check, 2026-09-09.
Avatar of @d4ma4ma4ma

@d4ma4ma4ma: statistics and cleanliness index

LAVANG

visual prod - @lav4ng

Share this report
Telegram

Grade D some metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-09
Subscribers
116
Median views
482
ERR
415.5%
Posts sampled
37
Niche Art & Design

Data from 2026-09-09 — 29 days old.

Assessment summary

With a base of only 116 subscribers, a median of 482 views and targeted spikes in Stars reactions point to the likely use of external or inflated traffic.

A high share of deleted posts (38%) and irregular posting make the reach unstable, leaving ad purchases on the channel a questionable decision.

What to pay attention to

Spike in paid (Stars) reactions on posts (up to 50 stars)

Some posts have far more paid (Stars) reactions than the rest — up to 50 stars (≈17% of the post's views), although free reactions are available too. Telegram counts stars, not people: one generous subscriber can cause such a spike.

What grade D means

The index is clearly lowered: one or more metrics fall outside usual values. The “How the assessment was produced” section shows which ones.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 14 Art & Design catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 36 to 164,419 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 14 of 14
@d4ma4ma4ma 415.5%
similar channels median 85.9%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 9 of 14
@d4ma4ma4ma 3.33
similar channels median 2.41

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 37 posts with views, from Feb 21 to Aug 30. The dashed line is the median (482).

0496992Feb 21: 699 viewsFeb 21: 724 viewsFeb 21: 725 viewsFeb 21: 707 viewsFeb 28: 992 viewsMar 7: 529 viewsMar 7: 981 viewsMar 9: 615 viewsMar 27: 518 viewsMar 27: 716 viewsMar 27: 709 viewsApr 14: 586 viewsApr 19: 559 viewsApr 30: 855 viewsMay 8: 916 viewsMay 16: 473 viewsMay 19: 446 viewsJun 4: 393 viewsJun 8: 774 viewsJun 14: 482 viewsJun 14: 482 viewsJun 21: 447 viewsJul 10: 552 viewsJul 12: 371 viewsJul 12: 397 viewsJul 12: 396 viewsJul 12: 449 viewsJul 28: 451 viewsJul 28: 452 viewsJul 30: 303 viewsJul 30: 360 viewsAug 5: 324 viewsAug 25: 369 viewsAug 25: 370 viewsAug 25: 365 viewsAug 25: 361 viewsAug 30: 127 views Feb 21Aug 30
  • post views
  • median 482

Maximum: 992 views. Data as of Sep 9.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jul 28: index 95, grade A+Jul 28Sep 9: index 50, grade DSep 9

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Some of the channel's metrics deviate, so it is hard to say in advance how many people will see an ad.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 37.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @d4ma4ma4ma

What risk level is assigned to the channel?

The channel received a risk score of 50 out of 100 (yellow zone) with a low confidence level due to the small audience size of 116 subscribers.

Why does post reach exceed the subscriber count?

Median views stand at 482 with an ERR exceeding 415%, accompanied by spikes in star reactions and comments from a narrow group of users (only 5 unique authors).

Is it advisable to place ads here?

Ad placement is classified as questionable, as there is a risk that part of the views is of artificial origin, and the share of deleted posts reaches 38%.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-09
Sample
The latest 37 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @d4ma4ma4ma assessment dated 2026-09-09 uses 37 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 116 subscribers, median post views were 482, ERR was 415.5%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.