TG Inspector TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @Crypto_wllah

@Crypto_wllah: statistics and cleanliness index

Crypto - media, marketing, design analytics, news. It is a high-quality solution that meets all the needs of customers in work and business. Save time with Crypto! Promotion_ @Premkumarchoudhry Buy ad https://telega.io/c/Crypto_wllah

Share this report
Telegram

Grade C some metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-28
Subscribers
27,070
Median views
30,512
ERR
112.7%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Cryptocurrencies
Post language English
Channel age 3 years

Data from 2026-10-28 — 10 days old.

Assessment summary

English-language crypto feed of memes, price charts, and short summaries like “Bitcoin on-chain activity has hit 2-year lows” — all posts in the sample are photo posts with captions, with no forwards and no ads.

ERR 112.7% — higher than any similar channel in the catalog (their median is 14.5%), while reactions are almost absent: 0.05% of views vs. 0.62% for the group. Over two months, subscribers decreased by 2 thousand, and the last post was published 21 days ago. Placement has been flagged as questionable due to the passive audience, and no ad posts were found in the sample — how integrations perform here cannot be seen from this data.

About the channel

English-language crypto channel: memes about traders, summary images on Bitcoin and Ether prices, short market news. It has been run for more than three years; all posts in the sample are photo posts with a one- or two-sentence caption.

In the catalog, @crypto_bitcoin_2025_26 and @crypto_world_unity are nearby. By subscriber count, this channel is larger than each of them; the share of subscribers who see a post is higher than @crypto_world_unity's but lower than @crypto_bitcoin_2025_26's.

What it publishes:

  • Memes about traders: “first day in crypto and three years later” — a phone that survived a war.
  • Market summaries: short notes such as Bitcoin network activity falling to two-year lows according to Santiment.
  • Infographics: images with prices and market sentiment — for example, BTC at $66K in 2024 and in 2026.

Posts are published mainly during the day (82%) and on weekdays (88%); by subscriber count, the channel is in the middle of the “Cryptocurrencies” niche. They write rarely and briefly: about once every ten days, without ads or forwards from other channels.

By subscribers, it ranks #31 of 83 channels in the Cryptocurrencies niche of the catalog.

What to pay attention to

Views without engagement (reactions ≈ 0.050% of views)

There are views but almost no reactions. Usually with such reach, at least some people react to posts.

What grade C means

Some metrics fall outside usual values — for example reach, view spread or reactions. The “How the assessment was produced” section shows which ones.

Channel content

🤖 Possible AI-generated content

A noticeable share of posts are uniform captions with emojis and slogans (“Buy your freedom”, “HODL strong”) over templated visuals; one image bears an AI generator watermark.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 22 Cryptocurrencies catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 9,072 to 80,065 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 21 of 22
@Crypto_wllah 112.7%
similar channels median 15.6%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 17 of 17
@Crypto_wllah 0.05
similar channels median 0.62

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Scroll horizontally to see the full charts.

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Oct 30 to Oct 6. The dashed line is the median (30,512).

024K49KOct 30: 20,569 viewsMar 12: 14,089 viewsAug 8: 6,463 viewsNov 5: 23,200 viewsNov 8: 26,041 viewsNov 12: 28,145 viewsNov 18: 26,328 viewsNov 30: 30,605 viewsDec 3: 32,235 viewsDec 9: 28,198 viewsDec 15: 29,874 viewsDec 19: 39,195 viewsDec 26: 29,186 viewsDec 31: 33,480 viewsJan 12: 41,227 viewsJan 22: 37,573 viewsJan 26: 36,483 viewsJan 26: 39,841 viewsFeb 12: 29,477 viewsFeb 21: 39,228 viewsMar 18: 26,795 viewsMar 27: 48,993 viewsApr 6: 36,241 viewsApr 13: 30,419 viewsApr 28: 31,435 viewsMay 5: 36,521 viewsMay 11: 35,164 viewsMay 20: 28,346 viewsMay 27: 24,957 viewsJun 4: 26,977 viewsJun 11: 34,254 viewsJul 1: 38,927 viewsJul 12: 42,612 viewsJul 25: 34,898 viewsAug 10: 32,839 viewsAug 20: 25,264 viewsAug 24: 40,213 viewsSep 23: 28,416 viewsSep 28: 22,262 viewsOct 6: 21,479 views Oct 30Oct 6
  • post views
  • median 30,512

Maximum: 48,993 views. Data as of Oct 28.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Elevated reach: ERR ≈ 113%

On a large channel, views are close to or above the subscriber count. This may be normal for viral content, but it warrants attention.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Sep 1: index 50, grade DSep 1Sep 27: index 55, grade CSep 27Oct 28: index 55, grade COct 28

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

The audience barely reacts to posts.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @Crypto_wllah

Why does the channel have grade C?

The purity index is 55 out of 100, level “there are deviations.” The check found views without reactions and reach above the subscriber count.

How many people will see a post in @Crypto_wllah?

The median views are about 30.5 thousand with 27 thousand subscribers, ERR ≈ 112.7%, which is higher than similar channels in the catalog. At the same time, there are almost no reactions — 0.05% of views.

How advisable is it to place ads here?

Advisability of placement is marked as questionable: the audience is passive, and there are almost no reactions. Reach of ad posts was not calculated — no ad posts were found in the sample.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-28
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @Crypto_wllah assessment dated 2026-10-28 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 27,070 subscribers, median post views were 30,512, ERR was 112.7%, and the cleanliness index was 55/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/obsessed_with_ai.