Fake engagement check for @COMPOTSTORIES966

Компот - истории🦋 — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-09.

Истории компота с инстаграмма и вк

91 /100

Grade A+ low manipulation risk cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-09

Subscribers: 93
Median views: 23
ERR: 24.7%
Posts sampled: 40

Assessment summary

The channel is a small fan resource aggregating content from blogger Kompot, with a repost share of 57% and a median of just 23 views. The minimal risk score reflects the absence of commercial fraud purchasing signs; however, advertising placement here is questionable: with a subscriber base of under 100 followers, the platform has practically no reach of its own or unique engaged audience.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 8 checked Video Games channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 46 to 272 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 6 of 8

24.7% for @COMPOTSTORIES966 similar channels median: 56.1%

Reactions per 100 views higher than 6 of 8

6.25 for @COMPOTSTORIES966 similar channels median: 3.68

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source: Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot: 2026-09-09
Sample: The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method: TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result: The @COMPOTSTORIES966 assessment dated 2026-09-09 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 93 subscribers, median post views were 23, ERR was 24.7%, and the cleanliness index was 91/100.
Limitations: This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Mostly reposts and weak reach — little audience of its own.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

What grade A+ means

Almost no signs of manipulation: reactions look real and reach matches the subscriber count. The safest place for ads.

What to pay attention to

Almost all reactions are of a single type (94%)

The vast majority of reactions come from the exact same emoji, even though other emojis are also used in the channel. This pattern is typical of reaction inflation by bots stamping the exact same reaction.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 18 to Sep 9. The dashed line is the median (23).

post views
1 post newer than one day and still gaining views
median 23

Maximum: 240 views. Data as of Sep 9.

No deviations found in views. Manipulation doesn't always show up in views, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

Forwarding links

@COMPOTSTORIES966 forwards posts from

@tasty_compot17 23 forwards mutual

@COMPOTSTORIES966's posts are forwarded by

Only among channels we have checked.

@tasty_compot17 1 forward mutual
@tasty_compot13 2 forwards

Check today: @COMPOTSTORIES966

Data from 2026-09-09 — 11 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @COMPOTSTORIES966 and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @COMPOTSTORIES966

Questions about @COMPOTSTORIES966

Are there signs of audience inflation on the channel?

The deterministic risk score is 9 out of 100, which indicates no signs of inflation, although the confidence of the analysis is low due to the small number of subscribers (93 people).

Why is the feasibility of advertising placement marked as questionable?

The channel acts as an aggregator of third-party content with a high repost share (57%) and a median of just 23 views, meaning there is no solvent, concentrated audience for commercial promotion here.

What reach can be expected upon publication?

The median reach is around 23 views per post, with a high variance in views across posts and no prior history of ad integrations in the feed.